Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The DEI Regime
City Journal ^ | July 13, 2022 | Christopher F. Rufo

Posted on 07/13/2022 2:18:31 PM PDT by Heartlander

The DEI Regime

Every Fortune 100 company has now adopted “diversity, equity, and inclusion” programming.

“The chief business of the American people is business,” President Calvin Coolidge once said. One hundred years later, Americans’ chief business increasingly is managing racial and sexual politics through the ideology of “diversity, equity, and inclusion.”

I have surveyed the programming of every Fortune 100 company and have confirmed that all of them have now adopted so-called DEI programs. These initiatives are no longer limited to high-technology firms in the coastal enclaves; they have spread to traditionally conservative sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing, insurance, and oil and gas. The result is clear: every major corporation in the United States has submitted to DEI ideology and begun to make it a permanent part of its legal and human resources bureaucracy.

No doubt some of these programs are benign. Many companies adopt DEI policies out of pressure to conform. Other companies, however, use diversity, equity, and inclusion to promote the most virulent strands of critical race theory and gender ideology. I have documented many examples: Bank of America teaching employees that the United States is a system of “white supremacy”; Walmart telling workers they are guilty of “internalized racial superiority”; Lockheed Martin forcing executives to deconstruct their “white male privilege”; and Disney promising to abolish the words “boys” and “girls” in its theme parks and inject “queerness” into its children’s programming.

Three factors drive corporate executives to adopt DEI programs. First, these initiatives serve as an insurance policy against frivolous race- and sex-discrimination lawsuits. The legal department can point to mandatory trainings and policies as evidence that the company is “doing something” to prevent discrimination. Second, executives create these programs to appease internal activist groups that want to use the corporation as a platform for left-wing race and gender activism. Third, splashy DEI initiatives, such as Wal-Mart’s $100 million “Center for Racial Equity,” form part of a reputation-laundering strategy, improving a company’s public image and preempting Black Lives Matter-style protests through fashionable philanthropy. As a bonus, corporate executives, most of whom are rich but not famous, can use the associated galas, events, and junkets to boost their social status and hobnob with celebrities and political figures.

Some conservative commentators have pointed out the internal contradiction of corporate DEI policies: they don’t reflect the values of customers and don’t serve the bottom line; the political meaning of the word “equity,” for example, is predicated on an anti-capitalist worldview. But this assessment misses the broader point that, given the current political, social, and legal incentive structure, executives are making a rational decision to adopt DEI policies, even if they are doing so in bad faith.

Conservatives’ goal should not be to point out the executives’ hypocrisy but to change their incentives in order to change their behavior. This goal is eminently feasible. In recent months, Florida governor Ron DeSantis has begun to develop a model for challenging the hegemony of the DEI bureaucracy. He has abandoned the traditionally Republican premise of corporate non-intervention and embraced a more muscular, Teddy Roosevelt-style strategy for combatting corporate malfeasance. Last year, he passed the Stop W.O.K.E. Act, which prohibits companies from promoting critical race theory-style scapegoating, stereotyping, and harassment. Next, he won a high-profile fight with Walt Disney Co., stripping the company of its special governing status and dealing a significant blow to its public reputation.

These actions in Florida have already had a ripple effect nationally. Corporate executives have been wondering about how to “avoid becoming the next Walt Disney Co.” Some firms, including Netflix, have laid off diversity, equity, and inclusion employees—in anticipation of economic headwinds, no doubt, but also because the recent controversies around DEI more generally have opened up the space to do so.

Conservatives need to build on these efforts by developing a comprehensive agenda for pushing back against left-wing ideology in corporate America. First, legislators must protect firms from frivolous discrimination lawsuits and abolish the “disparate-impact doctrine,” which presumes that firms are guilty of discrimination if all identity groups don’t achieve equal outcomes. Next, political and business leaders must work to rein in the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) policies driven by the BlackRock–Vanguard–State Street shareholder nexus through antitrust enforcement at the governmental level and by fostering new competitors in the private sector—such as Vivek Ramaswamy’s recently launched Strive Asset Management, a firm that promises to restore the primacy of “excellence over politics.” Finally, conservative activists should follow the Disney model and vigorously target the reputation of firms that insist on promoting critical race theory and gender ideology at work. A clear message should be sent to executives: “declare neutrality in the culture war, or we will make you pay a price in the marketplace.”

The road ahead will be difficult. Bureaucracies have an instinct for self-preservation, and DEI ideology has embedded itself in the country’s prestige institutions. But nothing is more important for the success of American innovation and self-governance than prevailing over a regime that seeks to supplant “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” with “diversity, equity, and inclusion” as the governing principle of the United States.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: dei; diversity; equity; postmodernism; wokeness

1 posted on 07/13/2022 2:18:31 PM PDT by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

We had a “tailgate” meeting at work this morning, and our supervisors started off with an “inclusion minute”.🙄


2 posted on 07/13/2022 2:24:48 PM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (One Nation, Under Fraud Completely Visible, With Spying and Lying Too All.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander
No doubt some of these programs are benign.

NO. None of them are benign. Some are just more obviously poisonous than others, but all are poisonous.

3 posted on 07/13/2022 2:26:31 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander
In his book The Parasitic Mind: How Infectious Ideas Are Killing Common Sense (Washington, DC: Regnery, 2021), Gad Saad uses a more appropriate acronym--DIE (Diversity, Inclusion & Equity).
4 posted on 07/13/2022 2:26:52 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2CAVTrooper

Get a new job


5 posted on 07/13/2022 3:13:05 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA (Scratch a leftist and you'll find a fascist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

Anti-white racism is what it is....

Even the dumbest whites are beginning to figure it out...


6 posted on 07/13/2022 3:18:42 PM PDT by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

DEI brought down Sri Lanka. These companies are next.

BTW, it’s DIE, not DEI


7 posted on 07/13/2022 3:53:58 PM PDT by beef (Let’s go Baizuo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

Fortunately I work for a small company that doesn’t have time for that crap.


8 posted on 07/13/2022 4:09:50 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Yep.

People of color = Every other race in the world, except for white people.

Now who talks like that?

It’s getting pretty obvious, but I don’t think it’s going to go down like it did for that little German fella’.

Well... maybe the very very end part.


9 posted on 07/13/2022 4:49:10 PM PDT by Sarcazmo ("Sarcasm is the highest form of wit" ~ O. Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

Easier to tune out the idiots.


10 posted on 07/13/2022 7:49:59 PM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (One Nation, Under Fraud Completely Visible, With Spying and Lying Too All.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

bump


11 posted on 07/13/2022 8:44:43 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (The “time out” generation didn’t produce as good a result as the @#$whoopin' generation. --Bob434)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson