Skip to comments.
Judge rules that several Minnesota abortion restrictions are unconstitutional
KSTP.com ^
| 7/11/22
| KSTP
Posted on 07/12/2022 11:43:50 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Count on Ellison to do absolutely nothing.
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Judges are not legislators.
Judges do not have the power to write or erase laws.
2
posted on
07/12/2022 11:47:06 AM PDT
by
Arcadian Empire
(The Baric-Daszak-Fauci spike protein, by itself, is deadly.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Judge shopping still a viable alternative to convincing political argument.
3
posted on
07/12/2022 11:47:49 AM PDT
by
Don Corleone
(leave the gun, take the canolis)
To: Arcadian Empire
Apparently the judge in this case didn’t get that memo...
4
posted on
07/12/2022 11:48:46 AM PDT
by
TheBattman
(Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists - redundant labels.)
Gilligan’s an island unto himself.
5
posted on
07/12/2022 11:48:56 AM PDT
by
Olog-hai
("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Local leftist judge tells Supreme Court to go pound sand.
That should be the headline, followed by “new opening at local court. “
6
posted on
07/12/2022 11:49:18 AM PDT
by
Dogbert41
(Blessed are the peace makers.)
To: Don Corleone
Judge shopping. Leftist favorite pass-time. Like cheating, they can’t win any other way. And in my book, IT’S NOT WINNING!
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Attorney Generals have clients?
8
posted on
07/12/2022 11:50:12 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
( )
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
The plaintiffs argued that the law made abortion less accessible and less affordable when qualified advance-practice clinicians and (to an extent) some advanced practice registered nurses have the skills for abortion care. The defense largely agreed.
Hard to have a working adversarial system when there is no adversary.
9
posted on
07/12/2022 11:50:25 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(What was 35% of the Rep. Party is now 85%. And it’s too late to turn back—Mac Stipanovich )
To: Dogbert41
This has to do with Minnesota only. And thats exactly what the Supreme Court did... pushed this back to the states.
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Tomorrow I go vote early for Value them Both in Kansas to amend the state constitution. Two abortion doctors filed and won a law suit three years ago and our liberal SCt found that the Kansas Constitution has a secret right to abortion. I do think that if we lose this battle that the case needs to be reviewed.
11
posted on
07/12/2022 11:52:36 AM PDT
by
Mercat
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Why should he? The judge struck down just about anything that would make it harder to obtain an abortion.
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
“UNCONSTITUTIONAL”.......LOL!!!
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
a restriction on something that is unConstitutional would itself be unConstitutional
iow... it should all be removed from the books and restrictions for its practice put in place
14
posted on
07/12/2022 11:56:34 AM PDT
by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
To: Olog-hai
15
posted on
07/12/2022 11:56:53 AM PDT
by
Governor Dinwiddie
(LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
To: Arcadian Empire
Judges do not have the power to write or erase laws. Sadly, leftwing communist judges (including SCOTUS) DO have the power to write or erase laws due to the power they gave to themselves.
In fact, they've been doing it for decades.
16
posted on
07/12/2022 11:57:41 AM PDT
by
newfreep
(“Leftism, under all of its brand names, is a severe, violent & evil mental disorder.”)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
It might be fun to read his decision. I wonder what he bases it on, regarding what’s in the constitution. Perhaps he’s finally found a use for the 9th amendment. 🤣
17
posted on
07/12/2022 11:59:00 AM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(My prediction: Harris is Spiro Agnew. We'll soon see who becomes Gerald Ford, and our next prez.)
To: bigdaddy45
This has to do with Minnesota only. And thats exactly what the Supreme Court did... pushed this back to the states. True, but that won't stop our resident "experts" claiming that this is unconstitutional defiance of the US Supreme Court.
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
I - very much - want an end to abortion.
That being said, the SCOTUS did not outlaw abortion. They only said that abortion is not a Federal right.
States can, and will, legalize abortion to lesser and greater extents. The pro-life people now have 50 fights on their hands.
There were many, many legislatures that did not want to go on the record being for or against abortion. Roe v Wade gave them political cover. That is now gone and they have to pick a side.
We should send all that vote for abortion “Friends of Moloch” t-shirts...
19
posted on
07/12/2022 12:00:44 PM PDT
by
Crusher138
("Then conquer we must, for our cause it is just")
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
I never have understood justifying abortion on the basis of a right to privacy.
Does this mean that it is okay for me to murder someone so long as I kill them in a place where no one will see me?
Somebody help me here . . . .
20
posted on
07/12/2022 12:03:43 PM PDT
by
RatRipper
(The Biden Adm is leading an attack against US citizens . . . pure evil.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
