Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Democrats Undermine Supreme Court 2nd Amendment Ruling In New Legislation
Legal Insurrection ^ | Friday, July 1, 2022 at 01:00pm | William A. Jacobson

Posted on 07/01/2022 6:06:08 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Among other things, lawful concealed carry of guns would be banned almost everywhere by designating much of society a “sensitive” location. State governors like Kathy Hochul in New York are banking on the limited SCOTUS docket to evade the ruling, even if they ultimately lose.

When the Supreme Court Struck Down The Restrictive New York Gun Licensing Law, it was an important reiteration of 2nd Amendment protections. But the battles will continue at the state level and the lower federal courts, because the opponents of the 2nd Amendment are hard at work, including in Rhode Island, to deprive citizens of their constitutional rights. DOJ already has signaled that it will do whatever it can to limit the impact of the SCOTUS ruling.

One aspect of the SCOTUS ruling that is underreported is that in orders entered by the Court in other cases, it vacated anti-2nd Amendment lower court decisions and remanded for further proceedings. Some of those cases involved the types of limitations, e.g. on magazine capacity and age, that are at the core of efforts to undermine the SCOTUS decision in blue states.

The Gun Rights Foundation has a good summary:

The Supreme Court just struck down four anti-gun lower court rulings:


(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; bidenvoters; noguns4you
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 07/01/2022 6:06:08 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

98% OF MASS SHOOTINGS OCCUR IN GUN-FREE ZONES
REPEAL THE GUN-FREE SCHOOL ZONE ACT OF 1990


FACT: Guns prevent an estimated 2.5 million crimes a year or 6,849 every day. 98+% of the time the gun is not fired and no blood (including the criminal’s) is shed.

SOURCE: http://www.gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-facts/7.1/Gun-Facts-7.1-screen.pdf, pages 21, 83.

FACT: 98% of mass-shootings occur in gun-free zones

SOURCE: https://www.dailywire.com/news/what-percentage-mass-shootings-happen-gun-free-amanda-prestigiacomo



2 posted on 07/01/2022 6:07:10 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Contempt for pre-born human life breeds contempt for post-born human life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Typical. Just like you can never throw out their STRAIT FROM GOD EXECUTIVE ORDERS.


3 posted on 07/01/2022 6:10:30 PM PDT by Dogbert41 (Blessed are the peace makers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Mag bans” are limits to the size of legally permissible magazines, right?


4 posted on 07/01/2022 6:10:59 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; mylife; Joe Brower; MaxMax; Randy Larsen; waterhill; Envisioning; AZ .44 MAG; ...

RKBA Ping List


This Ping List is for all news pertaining to the 2nd Amendment.

FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.

More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.


5 posted on 07/01/2022 6:14:36 PM PDT by PROCON (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Those who infringe Amendment II should be stricken from the public payroll and pension systems as required by Amendment XIV, Section 3.


6 posted on 07/01/2022 6:17:07 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Ms. Hochul said that the expansive list of places where guns would be banned was crafted to reassure New Yorkers “that when they go there to gather, work, places of worship, polling places and larger gathering spaces, they don’t need to worry about a criminal being right there next to them having a weapon.”


7 posted on 07/01/2022 6:19:22 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It’s worse than people realize. You could get in your car, drive down the road and unless a private property location has signage that guns are permitted, be unable to access the premises without committing a felony. It’s quite possible you won’t be able to go to almost *any* private location. I mean, are homeowners going to put these signs up?

The same for walking down a public sidewalk. Nowhere to go.

I doubt many businesses are going to put up signage that guns are allowed for fear of being criticized by people that support gun control, potential liability issues with insurance, etc.

It is in all ways, a de facto ban on concealed carry. I talked to an attorney friend and he does not see how this will stand, given Bruen. And disclosing social media accounts he believes is a non-starter.

What a mess.


8 posted on 07/01/2022 6:21:42 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus
“Mag bans” are limits to the size of legally permissible magazines, right?

Correct, my state of WA's mag ban, (any magazine holding more than 10 rounds) went into effect today, July 1st.

You can possess them but can no longer buy them or sell them.

Yeah, it's a BS law that does absolutely nothing to affect criminal activity, just we lawful gun owners. And Idaho and Oregon are a short drive where you can buy them.

9 posted on 07/01/2022 6:21:43 PM PDT by PROCON (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

...they don’t need to worry about a criminal being right there next to them having a weapon.”


Criminals obey laws?


10 posted on 07/01/2022 6:21:50 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The bright side is how easy it will eventually be to conquer the Blue States. /$


11 posted on 07/01/2022 6:24:50 PM PDT by jcon40 (Machinery is only as good as its design and quality of parts. A citizen is only as good as...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Forget the permit. Just carry anyway.


12 posted on 07/01/2022 6:27:59 PM PDT by rexthecat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

If you buy them in Oregon or Idaho and bring them back in you are now an “importer”, which is illegal.

There’s a reason why these bills run to multiple pages.


13 posted on 07/01/2022 6:28:55 PM PDT by 21twelve (Ever Vigilant. Never Fearful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
Exactly … I altered her statement slightly.
14 posted on 07/01/2022 6:29:26 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

At this point, one should move out of NY if 2A is important to them. These communist will not comply.


15 posted on 07/01/2022 6:39:11 PM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Said this before and I will say it again. The Constitution was never meant to be a SUICIDE PACT.

It’s time for the REPUBLLIC OF TEXAS to make our move.


16 posted on 07/01/2022 6:43:34 PM PDT by Howie66 (Let's Go Brandon!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve
If you buy them in Oregon or Idaho and bring them back in you are now an “importer”, which is illegal.

That's true, but unless there are state line 'checkpoints', you can get what you need and flip-off the unconstitutional BS as you drive home.

17 posted on 07/01/2022 6:44:09 PM PDT by PROCON (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The only answer is Constitutional Carry.


18 posted on 07/01/2022 6:52:05 PM PDT by MercyFlush (☭☭☭ Soviet Russia must be destroyed. ☭☭☭)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

One of the posters there figured the strategy was to tie up the inevitable suit in response to the new infringement up the layers so it’d be years to hit the SC.

I don’t think so. I think, by remanding a bunch of cases at once, the Thomas court made it clear they’ll ‘reach down’ and quash that ploy.


19 posted on 07/01/2022 6:59:53 PM PDT by No.6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PROCON; 21twelve
If you buy them in Oregon or Idaho and bring them back in you are now an “importer”, which is illegal.

Pay cash. Decline the receipt.
Trash the packaging (if any) before ya leave town.

CA has this asinine "Prop 65" "warning" that manufacturers have to plaster all over everything they ship into CA for sale. I bought ABS inner wheel wells for my son's car, and they wouldn't ship them because they didn't have the damned labels. Never mind I can go down to Lowe's or Home Depot and buy a truckload of ABS pipe any day of the year.

So, I had them shipped to a friend in OR, instead, and paid them to "bounce" them to me in CA. That's gonna become a thing.

20 posted on 07/01/2022 7:02:43 PM PDT by HKMk23 (https://youtu.be/LTseTg48568)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson