Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Beauty.

I can almost feel the pressure building.

Should be an interesting summer.


1 posted on 06/24/2022 11:20:39 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: fruser1

ANTIFA and the various pro-abort groups promised to burn down Washington DC. I hope they don’t disappoint.

I doubt they will follow through - I am sure their FBI handlers have them on a very tight leash.


2 posted on 06/24/2022 11:22:30 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

why **** with contraception?


3 posted on 06/24/2022 11:22:35 AM PDT by mylife (It looks just like a telefunken U47... (===)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

I believe married couples should have access to contraception, but that’s not in the federal government’s purview.


4 posted on 06/24/2022 11:23:34 AM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

courtus interptus?


6 posted on 06/24/2022 11:24:01 AM PDT by mylife (It looks just like a telefunken U47... (===)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Keep the pressure up, Justice Thomas, and when they expire from the pressure dance on their graves


8 posted on 06/24/2022 11:24:16 AM PDT by Oscar in Batangas (An Honors Graduate from the Don Rickles School of Personal Verbal Intercourse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

I think Thomas believes the federal government shouldn’t be forcing the states to accept/require anything... the decisions should be up to each state.


9 posted on 06/24/2022 11:24:26 AM PDT by BuchananBrigadeTrumpFan (If in doubt, it's probably sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Alito’s original draft provided a basis for overturning many other decisions - but it was revised, I’m sure to get Roberts on board, to state that this decision was about abortion ONLY, and laid out the framework for why it wouldn’t be precedent for those other cases.

If it had gone 5-4 with Roberts a bitter dissenter, we would not be in as good a place as we are with a 6-3 decision.


15 posted on 06/24/2022 11:26:47 AM PDT by Jim Noble (I’ve stumbled on the side of twelve misty mountains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

It’s a hoax folks.


17 posted on 06/24/2022 11:27:39 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Thomas wants the GOP to lose.


18 posted on 06/24/2022 11:27:40 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

With the decision today, and the future Supreme Court decisions on marriage and contraception outlined by Justice Thomas, the Republican Party is headed for a permeant majority in Washington DC and across the country.


20 posted on 06/24/2022 11:27:55 AM PDT by Round Earther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Contraception, other than abortion does NOT take a life. Justice Thomas should leave that one alone


22 posted on 06/24/2022 11:28:25 AM PDT by BigEdLB (Let’s go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

The Supreme Court redefining marriage DOES need to be overturned.


24 posted on 06/24/2022 11:29:47 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin ( (Natural born citizens are born here of citizen parents)(Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Thomas is arguing that any decision ruled under the Court invention, substantive due process, needs to be looked at again.

This is today’s underlying victory.


27 posted on 06/24/2022 11:35:00 AM PDT by nicollo (the rule of law is not arbitrary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Bull crappola. I doubt Clarence Thomas said exactly that.


28 posted on 06/24/2022 11:35:11 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Yes!!!


32 posted on 06/24/2022 11:37:41 AM PDT by Halls (Christian, Conservative, Proud Texan, Patriot, 100% Pro Life!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

And get rid of Obamacare


33 posted on 06/24/2022 11:39:00 AM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Yes, drive the stake even deeper!


35 posted on 06/24/2022 11:39:47 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Thomas is just saying that “substantive due process” is an illegitimate line of constitutional reasoning, and that rulings based on it should be revoked. I regard it as highly unlikely that any state would ban most forms of contraception or reinstate laws against sodomy, which were very rarely enforced even before the Court banned them.


40 posted on 06/24/2022 11:44:17 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

These are issues the government should have no involvement, no funding, and zero laws. Marriage is a religious institution. Government has co-opted marriage to pick winners and losers when it comes to taxes and a variety of other benefits. As for contraception, government has no constitutional power to be involved in healthcare decisions or funding healthcare. Government has proven multiple times that they are abject failures when the get involved in healthcare. It should be noted that abortion is not healthcare. It is murder.


41 posted on 06/24/2022 11:44:18 AM PDT by ConservativeInPA (Scratch a leftist and you'll find a fascist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

I think the contraceptive case was really about doctors selling drugs.


43 posted on 06/24/2022 11:46:23 AM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson