Oh wait!
You mean to say Roberts voted the right way on this one, but Trump's faux "originalist" Gorsuch voted to the LEFT of Roberts AGAIN, and sided with the Marxist judges AGAIN?
Whoops.
Well, nothing to see here folks! Besides, I'm sure Gorsuch has some really awesome 'libertarian' reason for doing so. The wise Latina who agrees with him on all this stuff is very libertarian, right? And he's a textualist or whatever... and he's just bein' a good originalist and voting the way the writers of the law ORIGINALLY intended... like when he said the writers of the civil rights act TOTALLY had trannies in woman's restrooms in mind when they wrote the law the in 1964...whatever...
IT'S ONLY BAD WHEN ROBERTS DOES IT!
Now, move on, please.
Not sure the (2 of 3) libs (and Gorsuch) were wrong on this one.
“That doctrine allows serial state and federal prosecutions for the same crime, opening the door to double punishment or a second trial after an acquittal. Although neither seems just, the Court says both are perfectly constitutional”
I mean....maybe the majority is correct on the law but it sure sounds lame.