Posted on 06/21/2022 2:10:45 AM PDT by Spktyr
This is a video clip posted by KENS-5 TV out of San Antonio - pictures from inside the Uvalde school while the shooting was going on are starting to get out to the press. At 0:24, a still from the school security camera system shows officers with rifles holding a corridor... with a full height ballistic shield.
Not one hero on the whole force? Really?
So sad.
Just makes me wonder what local tax revenue was paying for...this wasn’t a legit police-force. Did they just hand out traffic tickets?
I can sort of understand not wanting to assault in against a long-barrel rifle without a shield and carbines as the argument can be made that charging in blindly underequipped and unprotected just means more dead bodies and you can’t help anyone if you’re dead... but now we know they *had* a shield. They had carbines. What the actual hell were these idiots doing?
If cops are this scared of a man with an AR-15, a mass gun grab will NEVER happen.
Ensuring the maximum body count of students?
To be fair and correct: It’s a school district police force (at least, those on site initially were from the school district police force) - not the city police force.
Many school districts have their own police - one of their major normal functions, though, is to ‘handle’ issues that come up so the regular police don’t show up and begin investigations that might lead to hard questions being asked of administrators and leadership. Many are, as a result, very much political.
That’s the empirical answer, yes. It was mostly a rhetorical question as we already know the answer.
No, they’ll show up with an MRAP and bulldoze the structure. Remember, you’re disrespecting their authority at that point, and there won’t be any innocents (in their book) around.
We were told they were waiting for a Ballistic Shield before they moved in.
Apparently that was a lie.
If placing your own life in grave danger for helpless desperate children, then please tell me what is.
If risk isn’t their cup of tea, they need to take off the uniform and stop pretending.
Simple answer.
Yeah, there was already one on scene.
They have the minimum equipment to assault in and they should have.
KVUE Austin has gotten a look at the current investigators’ timeline and has more info - video here. Warning, the reporter is extremely gay:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxeHz47o34Y
KVUE’s video expands this a bit further - it’s school cops that were first there, but at the point the school cops were taking fire there were also Uvalde city police there. So, the Uvalde city cops are also responsible for this debacle, under the command of the school police chief Arredondo.
If placing your own life in grave danger for helpless desperate children *isn’t worth it*, then please tell me what is.
(Coffee just now kicking in.)
As always…….excellent point.
We always see how 20 Cops surround buildings or houses with a gunman inside and they’re afraid to go in or react in anyway.
Even if they think the shooter might even be dead!
An Epidemic Of Cowardice?
Akos Balog
But do we have an epidemic of cowardice?
It’s a tricky question to answer.
After all, nobody’s invading Australia or any other Western nation: that would be the ultimate test of national bravery. And yet, there are signs that people are more fearful today across the West than in previous years:
People seem hesitant to speak up about many issues, especially when they think differently to the prevailing cultural orthodoxy (e.g. on gender and sexuality).
Cancel culture is a real thing: not only does it chill speech, but more often than not leads to swift apologies from the canceled, rather than Martin Luther-like ‘here I stand, I can do no other’ responses.
And if panic buying is any indication, fear is bubbling beneath the surface, ready to launch us to grab the last rolls of toilet paper when #toiletpaperapocalypse trends on social media.
Update: there is new evidence that most Australians would flee if we faced the same situation as Ukraine. The Australian’s foreign affairs editor Greg Sheridan writes about a new poll just released:
‘A slim majority of Australians, if faced with a situation similar to that faced by Ukrainians, would not stay and fight for their country but would seek to flee overseas, according to a fascinating poll conducted by Compass Polling.’
Yes, Weiss may have a point when it comes to our growing fearfulness and – dare I say it – cowardice.
The Beliefs That Provide Fertile Soil For Cowardice
Whether or not there is an epidemic of cowardice, there are many common secular beliefs that provide fertile soil for the growth of cowardice.
Here are 6 such beliefs:
1) We value the ‘victim mentality’
Western culture now places special moral value on being a victim.
While there are genuine victims that should be valued and cared for, we now live at a time when nearly everyone wants to be seen as an oppressed victim by virtue of their group identity. You get special privileges and cultural kudos if you’re a victim, and you get to say and do things that other people can’t, especially about political and cultural issues.
And so, the victim mentality is rife across much of the West.
But the victim mentality is destructive. There’s a tendency to blame your problems on others, and expect them to fix it for you. It corrodes individual and group agency and turns your focus inwards rather than to the needs of others.
Such a mentality doesn’t promote bravery. On the contrary, it lays down fertile soil in which cowardice can grow.
2) We live for nothing greater than ourselves
We’re a culture that lives for no higher purpose than self-fulfilment.
Whether it be the fulfilment from work, family, or entertainment, our highest goal is self. We’re self-made people.
But if you live for nothing greater than yourself, you won’t fight for anything but yourself.
Instead, you’ll stay silent instead of speaking up. You won’t stand up for others if it means you might get hurt. And why would you put your life on the line for your nation?
3) We expect (and even demand) to be comfortable
Modern Westerners are the most physically comfortable generation in human history.
We haven’t had to fight a major war in 70 years. We’re not under constant threat. And our living standards are through the roof (especially compared to previous generations).
We expect, nay demand, comfort.
And if that’s our expectation, we’re less likely to do things that compromise comfort.
4) Our society is atomised and lonely, with little holding us together
While previous generations had many ‘mediating institutions’ with loyal followings such as social clubs, religious organisations and philanthropy movements that brought people together, such organisations are few and far between.
Most people in our culture don’t belong to any particular club (or if they do, they’re more consumers than givers). We’re more lonely, more individualistic than in recent history. And as such, there’s little holding us together.
Yes, there are tribal loyalties strengthened through the rise of identity politics (e.g., race, sexuality, gender).
But neither tribalism nor individualism can hold societies together, let alone inspire people to sacrifice themselves for others outside their inner circle. Without bonds of affection for others, we revert to only thinking about ourselves.
And that’s not exactly a recipe for courage.
5) We increasingly see the West not as a beacon of hope, but as a bastion of bigotry
Many secular elites across the West have bought into Critical Theory inspired views of Western Civilisation.
They increasingly see the West as irredeemably racist, xenophobic, homophobic, misogynistic, imperialistic, patriarchal and bigoted. They believe White Supremacy is rife. And that it would be best to overthrow it all and start again.
While few people deny that the West has its share of shortcomings, this view of the West will not inspire anyone to fight for it when push comes to shove.
6) We see morality as relative: there’s no principle worth standing up for
Moral and cultural relativism is rife across the West. We don’t see one person’s or culture’s morality as any better or worse than anyone else’s. We can’t condemn other people for their moral beliefs, because we don’t believe in a moral standard that transcends time and culture.
And so, moral confusion is rife. We’re hard-pressed to find reasons why we should stand up for ethical principles.
Nevertheless, if there is no external moral standard by which we can judge people of other cultures and times then why risk your neck to uphold moral principles like justice and freedom?
Thank you sir. After more than two decades of honing my political acumen, here, on Free Republic, I think I have a pretty good sense of things.
Global cowardice is on the rise.
I am not one of those infected. Life is what it is: Short and imperfect. To stand on principle, at the risk of life, is a no-brainer to me. It is far better to die, than to live in slavery, servitude, or fear.
I will stand fast. I can take no other choice.
I bet they hardly ever used them handcuffs either, huh?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.