1619 to 1865, is 246 years, so she’d be wrong even if she
did use the 1619 figure.
“1619 to 1865, is 246 years, so she’d be wrong even if she
did use the 1619 figure.”
Yes.
They say 400 years all the time.
It’s their mantra. I think to the extent they bother to try to account for it they mean from 1492.