“1619 to 1865, is 246 years, so she’d be wrong even if she
did use the 1619 figure.”
Yes.
They say 400 years all the time.
It’s their mantra. I think to the extent they bother to try to account for it they mean from 1492.
Yeah, could be. I doubt it, because they lie all the time.
To them actual claims don’t have to be factual.