Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Male blood donor turned away from clinic after he refused to answer whether he was pregnant
daytonews.com ^ | June 17, 2022 | Graham Grant

Posted on 06/18/2022 9:32:42 AM PDT by grundle

A 66-year-old male blood donor turned away from the clinic after refusing to answer a question about whether he was pregnant as part of a pre-donation questionnaire.

Male donor denied admission after he refused to tell if she was pregnant

For nearly 50 years, Leslie Sinclair has transfused an impressive 125 pints of blood.

After complaining, he said the staff told him they couldn’t accept his blood donation.

For nearly 50 years, Leslie Sinclair has transfused an impressive 125 pints of blood.

But his last trip was turned down after he refused to answer a question about whether he was pregnant or not.

Sinclair, 66, was ordered to fill out a form asking if he was expecting a baby or if he had been pregnant within the past six months.

When he complained that, as a man in his 60s, the question was inappropriate and that he should not answer it, Mr. Sinclair said the clinic staff told him that they could not accept his blood.

Leslie Sinclair, 66, was ordered to fill out a form asking if he was expecting a baby or if he had been pregnant within the past six months.

It emerged last night that all potential donors are being asked if they are pregnant to “promote inclusiveness” and because pregnancy “is not always visually clear.”

The standoff came as NHS England launched a campaign earlier this week to recruit another million blood donors over the next five years after numbers dwindled during the pandemic. The Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service (SNBTS) launched a campaign earlier this month to find 16,000 new donors next year.

It emerged last night that all potential donors are being asked if they are pregnant to “promote inclusion” and because pregnancy “is not always visually clear.”

Angered by the refusal to take his blood, Mr. Sinclair left and last night spoke of his disappointment at the “meaningless” decision.

The father-of-two from Stirling in central Scotland said: “I am angry because I have been donating blood since I was 18 and I go with it regularly. I am very happy to do it without any problem.

“There is always a form to fill out and that’s fine – they tend to ask about health conditions or illnesses – and it’s clear that the blood has to be safe. This time there was a question I hadn’t seen before: “Are you pregnant or have you been in the last six months?” which required a yes or no answer.

“I indicated to the staff that I could not be in this position, but they told me that I must answer, otherwise I would not be able to donate blood.

“I told them that it was stupid and that if I had to leave I would not come back and that was it, I got on my bike and left.

“It makes no sense and makes me angry because there are vulnerable people who are waiting for blood, including children, and are in desperate need of help. But they were denied my blood because of the obligation to answer a question that cannot be answered.

Mr Sinclair said: “They were denied my blood because of an obligation to answer a question that cannot be answered.”

Mr Sinclair said his wife Margaret, 59, was also shocked, adding: “She just can’t figure it out either.” Pregnant women must wait six months after giving birth to donate blood. Mr. Sinclair, a former engineering company driver, went to the Albert Hall in Stirling on Wednesday to donate blood.

Last night Professor Mark Turner, Director of SNBTS, said: “We appreciate the support of everyone in our donor community and thank Mr. Sinclair for his commitment over the years. While the issue of pregnancy is only relevant for those whose biological or birth sex is female, the gender assigned at birth is not always visually clear to staff.

“As a public body, we are aware of changes in society in how such questions can be asked without discrimination and have a duty to promote inclusion – so all donors are now being asked the same questions.”


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: dayton; genderdysphoria; grahamgrant; homosexualagenda; lesliesinclair; ohio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
To: grundle

Why is everything repeated four or five times in FR excerpts lately? There is a trend lately where everything in the excerpts is repeated four or five times.

On Free Republic posts, everything is repeated four or five times, and FReepers are asking why.

6/18/2022 - FReepers are asking “Why is everything repeated four or five times in these excerpts lately? There is a trend lately where everything in the excerpts is repeated four or five times.”

FReepers wondered why everything has to be repeated.


41 posted on 06/18/2022 10:04:13 AM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

What part of following the agenda do you not understand?
They don’t want your blood or care how loyal you are.
They don’t care about you.
Now you just go over there and congregate with all the bovine spongiform encephalopathy bitches that can’t donate either.

Mooooooo!


42 posted on 06/18/2022 10:04:21 AM PDT by Delta 21 (It started as a virus, and mutated into an IQ test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

(I’m no longer astounded at the rampant insanity. It seems to be pandemic now)

Sign of the coming Tribulation; Sign of the Times.

This sort of ridiculous error is why I say Satan’s spirit of antichrist is preparing the world for the debut of Satan’s anti-messiah.

First, a Peace and Security deal for 7 years. And by peace shall he destroy many.

Daniel 8:23-25
King James Version

23 And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up.

24 And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.

25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel%208%3A23-25&version=KJV


43 posted on 06/18/2022 10:05:47 AM PDT by SaveFerris (The Lord, The Christ and The Messiah: Jesus Christ of Nazareth - http://www.BiblicalJesusChrist.Com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: grundle

obligation to answer a question that cannot be answered

why could he not answer - No


44 posted on 06/18/2022 10:06:25 AM PDT by Jolla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
I regularly donate blood at Children's Hospital in Boston. Obviously a Maoist city...and given that it's a Harvard teaching hospital it's surely “woke”...times 10. Next time I go I'd wager that I'll be asked if I'm pregnant.
45 posted on 06/18/2022 10:06:32 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Covid Is All About Mail In Ballots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I was half-expecting him to be arrested for a “hate crime” for refusing to play along with their game.


46 posted on 06/18/2022 10:06:42 AM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

““It makes no sense and makes me angry because there are vulnerable people who are waiting for blood, including children, and are in desperate need of help. But they were denied my blood because of the obligation to answer a question that cannot be answered.”

It can be answered easily: no.

He withheld his blood so no crocodile tears.


47 posted on 06/18/2022 10:08:06 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Blind stupid & spineless.


48 posted on 06/18/2022 10:12:52 AM PDT by Buttons12 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

What is the definition of a man?


49 posted on 06/18/2022 10:13:11 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

If there’s doubt, whip it out!


50 posted on 06/18/2022 10:15:31 AM PDT by Oscar in Batangas (An Honors Graduate from the Don Rickles School of Personal Verbal Intercourse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jeffersondem

I don’t quite see what influence the U.S. Supreme Court has over Scotland’s Red Cross.


51 posted on 06/18/2022 10:18:37 AM PDT by null and void (We're trapped between too many questions unanaswered, and too many answers unquestioned...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I had a radiology tech ask me that about a year ago. I simply replied, “well, I haven’t had my period this month,” and left it at that.


52 posted on 06/18/2022 10:18:46 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham ("God is a spirit, and man His means of walking on the earth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Once many years ago, I answered “yes” to that question (I wasn’t paying attention)

They have been asking this for at least 40 years and not being that flexible.

I don’t think this is a woke situation here, just their being inflexible.


53 posted on 06/18/2022 10:22:56 AM PDT by Conan the Librarian (Conan the Sailing Librarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Ok....

Get your blood elsewhere... bye.


54 posted on 06/18/2022 10:26:02 AM PDT by Clutch Martin ("The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I’ve been asked exactly that question at several of my donations. I refused to answer that question telling them that this was anti-science, anti-Christian and insulting to me. Fortunately they filled in the answer themselves and we proceeded. I’m eligible for my 51st pint at this blood center next week. This might be interesting.


55 posted on 06/18/2022 10:26:49 AM PDT by ne1410s (2 Tim 4:3 For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

N/A was the right answer


56 posted on 06/18/2022 10:26:53 AM PDT by eclectic (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

I am still laughing.


57 posted on 06/18/2022 10:27:01 AM PDT by wgmalabama (We will find out if the Vac or virus risk was the correct choice -can put the truth above narrative )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
Couldn’t get past the name Leslie.

Bob Hope and Leslie Nielson might disagree...

58 posted on 06/18/2022 10:28:52 AM PDT by null and void (We're trapped between too many questions unanaswered, and too many answers unquestioned...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

He could have said that he had a baby a few years ago and the pain of passing the baby through his penis was so terribly unbearable and did so much damage that since the birth of his 10 pound son, he is unable to have sex at all.


59 posted on 06/18/2022 10:29:49 AM PDT by Clarancebeaks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Hes an old man in his 60s. This is England, he looks like what you’d expect such a man to look like in his 60s. Theres no ambiguity there at all. Further hes IN HIS 60s.

No one is bouncing around preggers in HIS 60s!!!!

This is just woke socialist orwellian idiocy. Meant to do just what happened here. If people don’t have to put up with the woketardiness, the sane people leave, and TPTB don’t care because they don’t care if their idiocy winds up hurting other people. They hope it does. Either to exploit one way or another or drops the population down.


60 posted on 06/18/2022 10:31:24 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson