Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court extends wait for decision in case that could overturn Roe v. Wade
Fox News ^ | 6/13/2022 | Tyler Olson

Posted on 06/14/2022 5:56:49 AM PDT by mjprice83

The Supreme Court Monday again prolonged the wait for its opinion which is expected to overturn the federal right to an abortion.

Last month, Politico published a leaked draft opinion which indicated the Supreme Court is set to overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 case that established a federal right to an abortion.

The justices released a handful of decisions Monday, including two immigration-related opinions, but not in the case Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. A ruling is expected to come by either late June or early July. The decisions issued Monday included: ZF Automotive U. S., Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd., Denezpi v. United States, Kemp v. United States, a case related to drug and gun crimes, and immigration-related cases Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez and Garland v. Gonzalez.

The Dobbs case stems from a dispute over a Mississippi law which bans abortion after 15 weeks. Argued in December, the case is seen as the biggest test yet for how the new 6-3 Republican-appointed majority on the court – capped with the confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett in 2020 – will handle major controversial issues.

As the Supreme Court continues to finalize its ruling in Dobbs and several other cases before its summer recess, the investigation into who leaked the draft opinion by court officials is ongoing.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; moloch; prolife; roevwade; scotus; sidebarabuse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

1 posted on 06/14/2022 5:56:49 AM PDT by mjprice83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mjprice83

Cowards!


2 posted on 06/14/2022 5:57:15 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjprice83

They like the drama.


3 posted on 06/14/2022 5:57:51 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjprice83

John Roberts has pressured the other justices to reconsider. He is such a coward.


4 posted on 06/14/2022 5:59:09 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

I second that.


5 posted on 06/14/2022 5:59:26 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

If the decision is changed... we will now know intimidation and threasts WORK.

They almost can’t change it for that reason alone.


6 posted on 06/14/2022 6:00:33 AM PDT by BuckeyeGOP ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mjprice83

All branches of government are now corrupt.


7 posted on 06/14/2022 6:01:44 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjprice83

Here’s a hot take - they’re taking time tryna make it unanimous ... to suppress the expected problems... lol


8 posted on 06/14/2022 6:01:46 AM PDT by Principled (Biden is illegitimate and whatever he says can be ignored. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjprice83; All
The court is refusing to react to the protests.

They insist on keeping to what they had already planned.

It is a reasonable response.

The headline makes it sound as if they decided to delay the opinion, rather than simply continue with tradition.

9 posted on 06/14/2022 6:02:20 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjprice83

Some 30 years back Bob Casey here in Pennsylvania “The Real Bob Casey” not to be confused with his son the Chuck Schumer acolyte signed off on the “Abortion Control Act”

This pending Supreme Court decision overturns not only Roe v. Wade but the Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision that came down right before the Fourth Of July.

The date was Monday June 29th, 1992.

A reminder to expect this decision around the same time this year perhaps Thursday June 30th.


10 posted on 06/14/2022 6:04:53 AM PDT by Nextrush (FREEDOM IS EVERBODY'S BUSINESS-REMEMBER PASTOR NIEMOLLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjprice83

Lol


11 posted on 06/14/2022 6:06:21 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjprice83
Postponed until they can move their families to undisclosed locations?

Terrorism works, and the Democrats are masters of it.

12 posted on 06/14/2022 6:06:46 AM PDT by Salman (It's not a "slippery slope" if it was part of the program all along. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

Probably waiting for all Justices to plan on a vacation after the ruling goes public.

Comey-Barrett has young child and school might be wrapping up.

I think after the release the Conservative Justices at least will vanish for awhile.

Which also means if the ruling wasn’t going to change Roe……it would have been released to throw cold water on protest.

So it should be a positive ruling for Pro-Life.


13 posted on 06/14/2022 6:07:13 AM PDT by David Chase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mjprice83

High visibility decisions like this one are almost always handed down on the last day or so of the session. There is nothing surprising in the timing of this.


14 posted on 06/14/2022 6:09:34 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Roberts is the gift from W that keeps on giving.


15 posted on 06/14/2022 6:11:38 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mjprice83

One of the Justices leaked it because otherwise the perpetrator would have been named already. Could have been Sotomayor..If found out to be her, then hopefully protestors could park outside of her residence for the rest of her life and bang a drum ‘slowly’.


16 posted on 06/14/2022 6:11:43 AM PDT by silent majority rising ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silent majority rising
Been saying that on Truth Social for a while now……..

17 posted on 06/14/2022 6:13:53 AM PDT by David Chase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mjprice83

They should have released it last Thursday just to nuke Liz Cheney


18 posted on 06/14/2022 6:13:57 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjprice83
The Supreme Court is waiting for the murder states to enact their own legislation in an attempt to lessen the rioting that will work against the Democrats.

New York Governor Hochul the Fool just signed the legislation for Murder State Number One yesterday:

https://nypost.com/2022/06/13/hochul-signs-abortion-protections-ahead-of-expected-scotus-decision/

19 posted on 06/14/2022 6:15:12 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjprice83

It maybe that it was never to be over turned in the first place. Could be a bs leak or just a judges opinion. Or a unfinished one. And does Roberts have the final say. Maybe the others didn’t agree with the opinion and as I said it was never going to be overturned and have the votes to over turn. Was just a play by the dems. Look over there and not over here.


20 posted on 06/14/2022 6:20:13 AM PDT by glimmerman70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson