Posted on 06/11/2022 8:16:55 PM PDT by RandFan
The Prince of Wales has privately described the government’s policy to send migrants to Rwanda as “appalling”, The Times has been told.
Prince Charles is said to be particularly frustrated at Boris Johnson’s asylum policy as he is due to represent the Queen at the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting in Kigali, the capital of Rwanda, this month.
Migrants who arrive in Britain illegally face being deported to Rwanda, more than 4,000 miles away, under a deal struck by Priti Patel, the home secretary, in April.
Today Patel overcame an initial legal challenge to the policy after a High Court judge ruled that the first flight due to deport migrants on Tuesday could go ahead.
(Excerpt) Read more at thetimes.co.uk ...
Can we send migrants to Rwanda too?
Then open Buckingham Palace to the hordes, Charlie.
Yeah,Charles is going to get himself into trouble as King spouting off about politics publicly. See the play, Charles the third..
Appalling is Charles as King of England.
The policy should be to make them walk to Rwanda.
Are they out yet ??? Insanity....no more immigration until the west gets things under control....if it was up to me.
Is is he saying Rwanda is appalling?
From what I read, it’s only a relative few migrants...unless I’m confusing it with something else.
Preacher: See here, you can’t turn all these people out into the night. It is inhuman, brother. Inhuman!
The Stranger: I’m not your brother.
Preacher: We are all brothers in the eyes of God.
The Stranger: All these people, are they your sisters and brothers?
Preacher: They most certainly are.
The Stranger: ...Then you won’t mind if they come over and stay at your place, will ya?
Even if we paid $5000 per each eviction, we’d still save billion$ unexpended dollars locally. If it became possible to evict our current crop of illegals thusly, they would likely self-deport rather than be sent so far.
Can we send Chuck and Camilla to Rwanda, too?
There are plenty of plants there for him to talk to.
When his mom dies, I really think that will be the end of the British Monarchy...or at least the end of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha dynasty.
...unless his reign is shorter than that of John Paul I.
They should shove them out halfway there......
Wills is just as bad as his father
Wow, I bet their arms get really tired.
In the case of the UK they were paying france to keep people who said they were seeking asylum in france while their case was reviewed.
But you know.... france.
And the people who were claiming to be so oppressed (by the... french? Maybe?) were paying huge sums of money to their fellow oppressed refugees to take them over to the UK in boats.
So the UK decided that rather then paying france (because you know, france) to house these people they would instead pay Rwanda. Since there is more then a bit of water between Rwanda and the UK they would stay there until their case was properly adjudicated.
Back when we actually had a president we were doing something like this with Mexico. You wanted asylum? You applied from Mexico.
Because marrying your mistress isn’t appalling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.