Posted on 06/11/2022 2:40:01 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
very year, the Norwegian Police Security Service (Politiets sikkerhetstjeneste, or PST) issues a National Threat Assessment report. Its objective is to identify what kinds of individuals or groups, either domestic or foreign, are likely to commit acts of terrorism in Norway in the year to come. Since I live in Norway and care about this question, I try to keep up with these annual documents. Granted, they tend to be rather exasperating — leaving the absurd impression, for example, that neo-Nazism is as prevalent as jihadist Islam. But this year’s report, published on February 11, proved even more vexing than usual. “Over the past year,” it reads, “PST has registered growing activity among individuals who advocate anti-government ideas.”
Yes, “anti-government ideas.” To be sure, the term “anti-government” (anti-statlig) isn’t entirely new to PST reports. It has cropped up previously in two of them — eight times in 2018, thrice last year — but in both cases it appeared in the context of statements that “anti-government” individuals were unlikely to constitute a security threat. This year, however, the word “anti-government” can be found no fewer than twenty-two times, and the passages in which it occurs express serious concern about the danger of “anti-government convictions” (anti-statlige overbevisninger), “anti-government thoughts” (anti-statlig tankegods), “anti-government ideas” (anti-statlige ideer), “anti-government sympathizers” (anti-statlige sympatisører), “anti-government currents” (anti-stalige strømninger), “anti-government perceptions” (anti-statlige oppfatninger), and “anti-government propaganda” (anti-statlig propaganda). The point: Norwegians who dare to disagree with the positions held by their nation’s ruling parties are potentially dangerous.
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
Unless you are a good obedient and compliant sheep they will now classify you as a potential threat.
What the Nazis did to the Jews, Democrats will do to us.
From the land of Vidkun Quisling.
The greatest threat to the plantation comes from slaves who question the business model.
Would critics of the Trump administration be labeled “anti-government”? Would left-wing critics of the police, or of ICE, or of the judicial system, be labeled “anti-government”? Would anarchists? Somehow, I doubt it. But proponents of our federal system of separation of powers, limited federal powers, and states’ right probably WOULD be labeled “anti-government.”
That encompasses speaking out agains the Five Year Plan, I'm sure.
Yes. We have to make sure not to let them pare down our numbers. If we can resist this, the outcome should be a lot different than in the ‘40s.
So you now have Democrat politicians saying the Republican Party needs to be cleansed, they are racists, deplorable, the most extreme in modern history.
That conservative justices won’t know “what hit” them.
That whites must come to terms with their whiteness, any black or Hispanic who is conservative is guilty of “white supremacy”.
That Antifa and BLM rioters are bailed out by politicians while people accused of trespassing on January 6th and parents at school board meetings are either held without trial for almost two years or are branded potential terrorists.
If this goes on much longer there is the inevitable result:
https://metallicman.com/laoban4site/what-the-progressive-liberals-have-in-store-for-conservatives/
And cowardly Republicans say nothing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.