Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS declines to hear appeal from McCloskeys
aol ^ | June 6, 2022 | CHRISTOPHER WILSON

Posted on 06/07/2022 11:03:21 AM PDT by MarvinStinson

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a petition from Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the couple who pointed guns at Black Lives Matters protesters outside their St. Louis, Mo., home.

The court declined to hear the McCloskeys’ appeal as they attempted to end a probationary period tied to a suspension of their law licenses instituted by the Missouri Supreme Court in February. The McCloskeys, who are white, were photographed pointing guns at racial justice protesters marching past their palatial suburban home in late June 2020.

While the state’s chief disciplinary counsel had pushed for a suspension of their licenses, the state Supreme Court instead instituted a one-year probation, meaning they’re allowed to practice law but are required to “provide 100 hours of pro bono legal services” and report any other criminal charges or job changes. They must complete the probation to avoid having their law licenses suspended.

The pair pleaded guilty to misdemeanor assault and harassment charges and turned in their guns in June 2021 after their defense attorney successfully pushed to remove a prosecutor seeking felonies for unlawful use of a weapon and evidence tampering. Shortly thereafter, they purchased a new AR-15-style gun and were pardoned by Missouri Gov. Mike Parson, a Republican.

“As many of you know, Patty and I faced political prosecution for having the audacity to defend our lives and property from an angry mob,” Mark McCloskey wrote in an August 2021 statement.

Former President Donald Trump supported the McCloskeys.

(Excerpt) Read more at aol.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: appeal; mccloskeys
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
In their petition to the Supreme Court, the McCloskeys argued that their Second Amendment rights were being violated, and noted the pardon and the fact that their actions had been praised by Trump. The couple were denied cert — meaning that fewer than four justices wanted to hear the case — despite a six-to-three conservative majority on the court, which includes three justices appointed by Trump.
1 posted on 06/07/2022 11:03:22 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

2 posted on 06/07/2022 11:06:42 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Article: Mark McCloskey had attempted to take a pro bono position advising the right-wing media group Project Veritas to fulfill the 100-hour requirement of the probation, but the state Supreme Court denied the request, saying it was not an “approved legal assistance organization.”


3 posted on 06/07/2022 11:06:51 AM PDT by TexasGator (UF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Thanks for that.


4 posted on 06/07/2022 11:08:24 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

But SPLC is? Let’s go Roberts!


5 posted on 06/07/2022 11:09:17 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

There are plenty of pro gun groups he can provide services to.


6 posted on 06/07/2022 11:11:16 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

“But SPLC is? Let’s go Roberts!”

I am guessing all 601(o) legal service groups are left-wing?


7 posted on 06/07/2022 11:13:15 AM PDT by TexasGator (UF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

“There are plenty of pro gun groups he can provide services to.”

Nope.

https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=184194


8 posted on 06/07/2022 11:14:15 AM PDT by TexasGator (UF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Justice is blind...

to the Truth.


9 posted on 06/07/2022 11:14:39 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (America -- July 4, 1776 to November 3, 2020 -- R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson
The pair pleaded guilty to misdemeanor assault and harassment charges

Dumb

10 posted on 06/07/2022 11:16:00 AM PDT by Pollard (If there's a question mark in the headline, the answer should always be No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

> their palatial suburban home <

I just love how the mainstream media subtly inserts propaganda into everything they write. It’s very important to know that the McCloskeys had a “palatial” home. Because none of this would have happened if they had lived in an average home.

I demand common sense palatial home control, now!

(Don’t worry, Clintons, Obamas, etc. Your mansions will, of course, be exempt from all regulations.)


11 posted on 06/07/2022 11:18:34 AM PDT by Leaning Right (The steal is real. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

whatever, 100 hours is nothing.


12 posted on 06/07/2022 11:19:43 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

“racial justice protesters marching past their palatial suburban home”


13 posted on 06/07/2022 11:21:09 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

#7

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4069297/posts?page=7#7


14 posted on 06/07/2022 11:24:35 AM PDT by TexasGator (UF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

This doesn’t surprise me. SCOTUS takes very few cases relative to the number filed, and this one doesn’t really have a clear issue for adjudication that would make it worthwhile. Too fact-specific.


15 posted on 06/07/2022 11:25:37 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I guess Biden lives in a beach shack. How many homes do the McCloskey’s own? How about lunch bucket Joe?


16 posted on 06/07/2022 11:26:34 AM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Sometimes your enemy gives you the answer to a problem.

Sell your house, move to Florida, take the state bar, And make a living off of libel and defamation cases from liberals.


17 posted on 06/07/2022 11:27:27 AM PDT by Salvavida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

It’s very obvious that “racial justice protesters” are allowed to commit crimes and not be prosecuted. Notice how Whites who refuse to submit are called racist, supremacist, and bigoted, and are put down.


18 posted on 06/07/2022 11:31:14 AM PDT by I want the USA back (To get the USA back - we have to recover from the current wave of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

And weren’t these “racial justice protesters” on their way to intimidate a judge or prosecutor.


19 posted on 06/07/2022 11:35:08 AM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson
They effectively lost any grounds to fight the charges when they plead guilty.

Never ever plead guilty when you are innocent.

20 posted on 06/07/2022 11:50:28 AM PDT by SecondAmendment (This just proves my latest theory ... LEFTISTS RUIN EVERYTHING !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson