Posted on 06/07/2022 5:51:56 AM PDT by SJackson
President Joe Biden has written an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal detailing his plan to fight inflation.
Well, perhaps the word "detailing" is too generous. The preponderance of the column features Biden taking credit for economic growth that can be attributed to the reopening of the economy that was shuttered by the governing class during COVID. Biden, of course, not only championed those closings but was critical of Republican governors who opened their states before he deemed it appropriate.
But with midterms approaching, there's been a concerted effort underway to exonerate the president, and thus Democrats, of any culpability for rising prices. Biden sycophant "Morning Joe," for example, contends that anyone who blames the president for more than a "passing impact" on inflation is a "lying hack or an ignorant rube." One wonders if that group includes former Obama adviser Steve Rattner, who argues that inflation has been driven by government putting "too much money in people's pockets"? Or Obama's onetime Director of the National Economic Council Larry Summers, who had been warning for more than a year that cash infusions would exacerbate inflation? Or Jeff Bezos, who correctly pointed out that the "administration tried hard to inject even more stimulus into an already over-heated, inflationary economy"?
Even if we were to concede that there is no good way to quantify exactly how much recent spending helped propel inflation — which is outpacing other Western nations — it's clear that the Biden administration completely mismanaged what should have been a slam-dunk recovery.
The Federal Reserve's easy monetary policy may not be the president's fault, but what about Washington's showering the economy with cash during a recovering economy? Democrats threw $2 trillion in "stimulus" into the economy and continued expanding the terms of unemployment benefits (even as the job market was recovering). All of this after the $3 trillion bipartisan "COVID relief" bill had passed.
With an assist from some Republicans, Democrats then approved another trillion-plus-dollar infrastructure bill. The president says that "tackling inflation" is his top domestic priority, but for more than a year most of his efforts, witnessed in the near-constant media coverage, were used to try to pass progressive reforms. It was Republicans — with help of two often-vilified, moderate Democrats — who stood in the way of Biden pushing through another nearly $5 trillion in social spending. The president still wants more "relief."
Biden can blame Vladimir Putin for creating disruptions in the energy market, but price spikes predate Russia's invasion of Ukraine. And surely one of the jobs of the president is to put the United States in a stronger position for economic shocks. Instead, Biden signed a slew of executive orders pausing government leases on public lands, shutting down the Keystone XL pipeline, and stymieing drilling in the Gulf of Mexico over concocted "social cost of carbon" externalities. Despite the (extra) uncertainty that came with a post-pandemic economy, all of this was done in the first weeks of his administration.
Biden is now calling these energy spikes, embedded in essentially all economic activity, a needed "transition." Virtually every action Biden has taken is conceived to make fossil fuels more expensive. That's the president's fault. Concerns over the availability of future energy production are baked into today's prices.
As a political matter, Democrats, obsessed with the idea of historic expansion of the welfare state, spent a year dismissing and mocking apprehensions over spiking prices. "There's nobody suggesting there's unchecked inflation on the way — no serious economist," Biden famously claimed.
As prices spiked and poll numbers dropped, Biden officials began to cynically use rising prices as a justification for more spending. Biden and his National Economic Council Director Brian Deese argued that Build Back Better — which you might recall costs "zero" dollars — would help combat inflation. The entire administration pushed the notion that the best prescription for alleviating inflation was more spending. Even today, as the president is poised to "forgive" student loans, pumping hundreds of billions into the economy to bail out rich kids, Deese maintains the impact "on inflation, in the near term, is likely to be quite small." Sure.
In any event, I assume Ron Klain isn't laughing off inflation as a "high class problem" anymore.
So, while it's true that inflation is a complex, multifaceted problem that isn't entirely any one person's or administration's or event's fault, it is fair to say that the Biden administration, from top to bottom, was as wrong as an administration could be on the issue. They ignored it. They weren't prepared. They exacerbated it. At the very least, Biden deserves a lot more credit for inflation than he does economic growth. If you're going to take credit for the latter, you deserve blame for the former.
Wrong. “81 million” voters are to blame and should suffer personally for their actions.
The Biden kakistocracy is deep into giving aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States.
Those 81 million voters won’t learn their lesson until they are starving and freezing in the dark.
I have no sympathy for them. Their pets on the other hand...
Its not that they were wrong, its that they love crisis....need crisis.... this is what they wanted all along. The policies they deleted or enacted guaranteed this result. Basic middle school economic classes understand this.
It is amazing the way these “journalists” say things like this. As if Biden has unilateral authority to simply “forgive” debts, and leave the lenders holding the bag. Of course, the lenders won’t be holding the bag, all of us taxpayers will.
The Democrats know they are going to take a bloodbath in the mid-terms, and rightly so.
So the solution will be to crank up the same voter fraud they used to steal the presidency from Trump.
“The entire aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed and, hence, clamorous to be led, by an endless series of hobgoblins , all of them imaginary.”
-H.L. Mencken
I propose a billboard to be erected in every swing state.
The left half would be a picture of a gas pump in California or Washington; the right half would be the picture of Biden at the top of this thread.
And the word “President “ in the background would be replaced by YOU OWN IT, JOE!”
There weren’t 81 million voters, just 81 million votes. I know you put that in quotes, but let’s remember that these were votes, not number of voters.
Please see my post 11.
You don’t believe that ridiculous 81 million figure?
Biden has some type “reverse Midas touch”.
Everything he touches turns into S**t
Biden himself may have done evil things in the past, but now he's senile, unaware, and really not responsible for "his" policies. And that makes it easier for whoever is running things (I have some ideas but no definite "theory").
Of course not. I use the 81 million figure exactly because it is so unbelievable and false. It is /sarc everytime I use it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.