Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/01/2022 5:31:26 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: lowbridge

Ignorant pig.


25 posted on 06/01/2022 5:44:52 AM PDT by HYPOCRACY (This is the dystopian future we've been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Even the jury given the swamp talking points...

Committed a crime...Yes...but at this point what does it matter...Acquit...!

We’ve seen this movie before...


30 posted on 06/01/2022 5:47:14 AM PDT by MCEscherHammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
"Jury forewoman explains Sussmann verdict: 'There are bigger things that affect the nation".

Well, I guess that pretty explains what's going on in the, so called, Department Of Justice.. No matter the law, the verdict must be politically slanted to please the left..

The bad guys (Crooks, thieves, liars and DC lawyers) are running the show...

31 posted on 06/01/2022 5:47:26 AM PDT by unread ("It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." W. Churchill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Trial venues need to be moved out of the District of Columbia as much as Constitutionally permitted. DC juries are infected with bias against Republican defendants and prosecutions.


32 posted on 06/01/2022 5:47:45 AM PDT by Socon-Econ (adi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

The Jury Forwoman sound just like Hillary. Wonder if she looks like Hillary.


33 posted on 06/01/2022 5:49:13 AM PDT by chopperk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
Juries in DC are made up of unemployed or retired Negros, all nursing the typical grievances. You probably couldn't find a more prejudiced jury pool in the United States than you you'll find in DC: nullification by Negro. Long before Ray Nagin, DC was known as Chocolate City.

The outcome is no surprise at all.

38 posted on 06/01/2022 5:54:09 AM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Jury Nullification... pure and simple...


44 posted on 06/01/2022 6:21:10 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

So the Einstein jurors weren’t concerned that Sussman was ‘lying’ just that it was to the FBI. Not that the FBI aren’t liars themselves but to their pea brain DemoRat minds it’s ok to lie and of no concern that Sussman wasn’t telling the truth. Lord I hate this modern culture of corruption we have to live in.


45 posted on 06/01/2022 6:23:51 AM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Imagine that! A bunch of DC jurers all agreeing to the same lie! Amazing!!


47 posted on 06/01/2022 6:26:11 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

“We’re giving our crooked libtard buddies a pass” said the libtard juror 🤪


52 posted on 06/01/2022 7:06:53 AM PDT by NWFree (Somebody has to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Translation: “He shouldn’t even have been charged. We do not believe it should be illegal to lie to the FBI if it helps Team Democrat.”


54 posted on 06/01/2022 7:36:40 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

I wonder how she felt about the phony impeachments ?


55 posted on 06/01/2022 7:37:37 AM PDT by daku
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
My goodness - talk about not understanding your role as a juror.

"Politics were not a factor" - they appear to have been entirely a factor. I don't think it should have been prosecuted," she said, The Washington Times reported. "There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI." is entirely political reasoning.

This behavior lead to a multi-year investigation over a made up hoax that tore the nation apart and you don't think it should have been prosecuted? "there are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI"? Embarrassing. Ridiculous.

56 posted on 06/01/2022 7:37:43 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Yup...translation: “Deliberations? We don’t need no deliberations.We don’t need no stinking deliberations!”


57 posted on 06/01/2022 7:38:47 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Covid Is All About Mail In Ballots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
The government "could have spent our time more wisely," she added.

Perhaps the must demoralizing and dehumanizing thing I have read in a while.

62 posted on 06/01/2022 7:45:11 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

So many things to say in response to this liberal hack, but I wont waste my time.


66 posted on 06/01/2022 8:04:23 AM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

There you have it. A clear case of “jury nullification.”


71 posted on 06/01/2022 8:20:15 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (3,162,066 active users on Truth Social)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Cool. So now we have a precedent to lie to the government.


73 posted on 06/01/2022 8:30:40 AM PDT by nonliberal (Z.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
Oooooh, dey couldnshba wait to run dey mouths.

15 minutes of fame. You all be askin' Tomeka Hart what dat be like. Ain't gonna like da ansuh.

“The jury composition was also challenging,” Turley added. “In a city that voted over 90% for Clinton, this was a nightmare jury pool. The judge also rejected requests to bar a couple jurors who raised legitimate concerns over their objectivity for the prosecution.”

In one instance during jury selection, Cooper overruled prosecutors’ objections to seating a man who had donated to Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, noting the prospective juror had “expressed a high degree of confidence” that he could be impartial."


75 posted on 06/01/2022 8:34:16 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (Enjoy the parade of Putlim Soviet c!rclejerkers lining up for the Tedlim-style putsch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

‘There are bigger things that affect the nation’

So corrupt it burns.


78 posted on 06/01/2022 9:28:51 AM PDT by Vision (Elections are one day. Reject "Chicago" vote harvesting. Election Reform Now. Obama is an evildoer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson