Orchestrating a Mass Shooting Event

Original Content | 5/28/2022 | By Laz A. Mataz

[Lazamataz]

IMPORTANT NOTE: In the effort to prevent the shooters from getting additional notoriety, I will refer to them, not by name, but as the Buffalo shooter and the Uvalde shooter, respectively.

Quite some time ago, after Sandy Hook's school shooting in 2012, then after another school shooting at Umpqua Community College in October of 2015, I began to be suspicious of the frequency and the targets of these shootings. I wrote an editorial titled "Thinking the unthinkable: A case for orchestration". In it, I explored the possibility that the mass shootings were being orchestrated and enabled by members of certain three-letter federal agencies. During the discussion that followed, one individual wrote something that stood out:

jsanders2001: what most people don’t know is that I have experience and training in influencing people using non-verbal / semantic techniques to get them to do what I want them to do as part of my training as an operative in another life. Propaganda and event / psychological manipulation are very real tools used by many law enforcement, investigative and/ or national security agencies, particularly the CIA. This would not be beyond the Obama administration at all given their anti-gun stance nor would it be difficult.

Intrigued, I asked how it might have been accomplished. jsanders2001 did not disappoint: He laid out a six-part set of instructions.

jsanders2001: "Its all psychological manipulation with a little assistance from operatives. Just an example of how it could be pulled off...
1. Set the goal - create mass shooting at X location.
2. Identify target matching psychological profile that would carry out the act. Example - troubled college student with psycholoical problems that is unconfident, has relatiobship problems, one parent family, has anger issues, pays attention or has commented on social problems in social media, is under psychologists’s care, is on psychotropic drugs
3. Engage target online speaking to issues that anger him acting setting up a profile that appears as the perfect adversary; if he is black, be white supremist; make statements will provoke him over and over into it forments into rage. Make him feel inferior like you are looking down on him. Dare him.
4. Ensure that he gets access to a gun via using an operative who is a plant that befriends him using a cover as a student. Plant thoughts that he needs to buy one for self ptotection from the white supremist buddy. Show him websites that feed the hatred and violence to solve his “problem” (other white people).
5. Create emotional disturbances and events that will cause hime to need to unleash. If he has a girlfriend steer her to a white man. She dumps him. He now wants revenge.
6. Make sure he takes his meds...
"In other words steer him right down the channel to the target incident. All the while he is being monitored and evaluated to ensure that he is manipulated to commit acts if violence that he feels are justified in his drug addled state..."

This was disturbing to hear, but it sounded credible and plausible. If we review certain data points around the Buffalo and the Uvalde school shootings, some of the points that jsanders2001 wrote seemed to align:

• Two unnamed boys were arrested in 2018 for planning a Columbine-style shooting at Uvalde school that was supposed to occur in 2022. This would allow an operative to identify a 'candidate' well in advance of grooming.
• Buffalo shooter cut the heads off cats. An expert on animal abuse stated that Cat decapitation should have prompted risk exam of Tops gunman.
  ... and....
  
• Uvalde shooter also tortured animals, with the 18-year-old suspect, Salvador Ramos, allegedly boasting about how he did it "all the time," Animal abuse is an action very common to sociopaths. This also would allow an operative to ensure they had the right caliber of actor.
• And the single most direct piece of evidence linking jsanders 'orchestration instructions' to the events that transpired: Authorities investigating if retired federal agent knew of Buffalo mass shooting plans in advance... Authorities believe the former agent – believed to be from Uvalde – was one of at least six individuals who regularly communicated with accused gunman Payton Gendron in an online chat room where racist hatred was discussed, the two officials said. Personally, I would question if the agent was indeed 'retired', or perhaps still contracting with the agency. In any event, that agent, retired or not, would be bound to alert those who could have intervened. The fact that there was no alert issued tells me that there is a distinct possibility this agent was a provocateur.
• Finally, a Freeper came to me personally, and shared some interesting points. That Freeper lived in the area in which the Buffalo shooting occurred, and among other points, let me know that:
  1. This area is in the 'hood', and a white person like the Buffalo shooter would have stood out a great deal while he reconnoitered the planned scene, and
  2. That a white individual was thrown out of Tops the day before, as he was being disruptive, and
  3. That a relative of this Freeper states that she saw this white individual as they reconnoitered the scene, and that he was accompanied by a second white individual. A handler, perhaps?

It would be interesting to continue to investigate the circumstances of these shootings to see if there are any more points that align with the 'orchestration instructions' we've been made privy to. There are also interesting facts that surround the Uvalde shooting. While they don't correlate to the 'orchestration instructions', they still bear mentioning. There are several that seem to be peculiar and defy probability:

• A teacher propped open a door one minute before the shooter crashed his grandmothers truck, and six minutes before the shooter entered the school. Now, personally, I wouldn't suspect that this teacher was in any way aware or participatory in the events, but it just seems weird that this would have played out as it did, especially with the tight timing.
  
  
• We also have the curious non-response of the police, who spent over an hour milling about the outside of the school rather than confronting the shooter. Many times, even a superficial gunshot wound can be fatal if enough time is allowed for the victim to 'bleed out'. If the police had engaged the shooter, there is a chance that he would have been forced to give enough ground to retrieve the wounded. At any rate, it certainly would have occupied his attention enough to minimize the amount of attention he could place on killing more students.
• Further, we were told that the police prevented parents from making a desperate attempt to rescue their children, even as they (so say the unconfirmed rumors) went in to retrieve their own children.
• Finally, there is a report that, on May 26th, a woman with a pistol killed a man who apparently was attempting a mass shooting. The timing is a little suspect. Was this intended to be a third mass shooting within ten days, to further catapult gun control into the national legislative agenda?

In his second term, a gun-control-frustrated Obama said that unless strict gun control was adopted, that the mass shootings would continue at the present frequency, and even increase. It always seemed to me that it was less of a warning, and more of a promise.

We have those who would impose gun control erroneously stating that mass violence either occur only in America, or occur with much greater frequency. None other than Politifact, who has a leftward bias, has marked this claim as "Mostly False".

Naturally, leftist publications are quick to pooh-pooh the idea that these shootings were orchestrated, calling it "a far right conspiracy theory", and asserting that "On ... fringe platforms where the far right gather, many asserted without evidence that it was a "false flag" operation staged by federal authorities to justify tighter control of guns.

Well, NPR, are you so willing to claim that this editorial is entirely without evidence? Certainly, I cannot cite an email or the transcript of a meeting where this is planned, but no one can claim that I am presenting no evidence. When enough data points align, one must be at least open to the idea that these events are orchestrated by an external force.

[Elsie]

We have air marshalls on planes to intercept highjackers, why not have school marshalls to do the same?

[Lazamataz]

That is the entire concept surrounding the arming of teachers.

[Lazamataz]

No, sir, thank YOU!

[Redcitizen]

Bump to the top.

[Elsie]

The way YOU describe a ‘mass shooting’ and the way the MEDIA does is vastly different!

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=number+of+mass+shootings+this+year&ia=web

[Elsie]

Supplementary notes

*As of May 16, 2022
The source defines a school shooting as every time a gun is brandished, fired, or a bullet hits school property for any reason.

 

https://www.statista.com/statistics/971473/number-k-12-school-shootings-us/

 

---

 

 

Kinda stretches the concept, doesn't it!

 

 

 

 

 

---

Two more 'definitions' from this link: https://www.npr.org/2022/05/24/1101050970/2022-school-shootings-so-far

---

 

 

Education Week  has been tracking school shootings since 2018. According to its database, 119 such incidents have taken place since then.
There were 27 school shootings with injuries or deaths this year.
The organization tracks shootings where a firearm was discharged and where any person (other than the suspect) has a bullet wound resulting from the incident.

 

The Gun Violence Archive, an independent data collection organization, has counted 212 mass shootings that have occurred so far this year, as of Tuesday. It defines a mass shooting as an incident in which four or more people were shot or killed, excluding the shooter.

[Elsie]

I hate it when they are awake and NOT breathing!