Posted on 05/26/2022 8:30:46 PM PDT by BereanBrain
What this.
I will summarize. Day 9 of Sussmann trial (this is a walkthrough of the trial transcript -curious no cameras, or recording, right)?
The evidence shows Sussmann guilty as hell. So much so the defense does not even contest.
BUT - Judge instructions to jurors include statements such as "if the defendant didn't mean to harm, was operating out of good faith that his actions were legal, even if he lied, he should not be held guilty"
This is how they cheat justice. Oh, and there are a bunch of Dem insiders on the jury.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHflMfTyxdQ
Get ready for justice denied.
I saw a lawyer today say that they cut this so close to the statute of limitations that they can’t charge Sussman for lying in the text message that said he wasn’t working for a client. But they can use the text message as evidence to support Baker’s memory that Sussman claimed not to be working for a client during his meeting with Baker the next day.
He also said, that Sussman’s faked evidence might not be considered material because the FBI was out to get Trump anyway.
I hope justice prevails.
That’s why I think he will walk. What I think, is that it might be a hung jury. If it’s a hung jury, he will not be charged again. He will walk. I hope I am wrong, but we have seen this dog and pony show before. I am not confident.
Jury instructions normally follow a well known format in each circuit court, in all courts really, with language from the actual law(s) the defendant is accused of violating as well as standard instructions that apply in all cases.
It’s been a long time, but I seem to recall both prosecution and defense review the instructions and provide the judge any input they have before the instructions are finalized and read in court.
Serious errors in jury instructions provide an avenue to appeal a verdict. That’s probably why they use a format.
The fix was in on day one, corrupt Judge, corrupt jury.
The judge
Clinton and the Deep State canceled/ruined the lives of Roger Stone, and many many other President Trump patriots.
I suspect that this trial is all about the narrative. Well, we investigated and had a trial. It is old news.
The Great Cheat is that the trial is in DC the seated jury will never convict.
Since there is no law Sussman is in danger of his life post trial. His life is the price of real justice
Clinton will never be held to account. Sad that we truly do not have equal justice under the law in this country.
Watch the video, the prosecutor and the defendant’s lawyer AGREE to this language!
This means the prosecutor could not care less! He doesn’t want a conviction!
No honest prosecutor would have agreed to the jury instructions language the “judge” came up with.
I have been following Gouveia throughout the trial.
The prosecution did raise objections to the good faith instructions and provided wording to add clarity, but the judge overruled them. He said they could make arguments at closing.
it was a weak objection...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.