Pro-Abortion Leftists Go All In on Eugenics

American Thinker.com ^ | May 22, 2022 | William Sullivan

[Kaslin]

On the legal front, it appears that Roe v. Wade may soon suffer a calamitous defeat. But its defenders continue to insist that Roe remains popular with the American people because they have already won American hearts and minds about the moral necessity for women to have the ability to "choose" to kill their unborn child in the womb.

In reality, they haven't been faring any better in that regard. Outside a small handful of the bluest states, which seem bent on enshrining a protection for a mother to kill her child up to the point of birth (and sometimes beyond the point of birth), many states are legislating stricter limits on abortion.

This is an understandable outcome. Roe has made the abortion issue a centerpiece of national debate, and that has magnified the easily understandable scientific and moral truths that contradict what the pro-abortion advocates have been selling for many decades.

The first unavoidable truth is that a child in his mother's womb is a living human being. A child in a mother's womb is nourished, moves, and grows. The child is, therefore, certainly alive in a scientific sense. That living creature is not, we know, a tree, a dog, or a chimpanzee. The child is a living human being, with human DNA that is unique only to that one human child, and no other human child on the planet before him.

This is a fact, and on this point, no serious person could disagree. This introduces the ethical question about taking that child's life while in the womb. Even Margaret Sanger, the early-twentieth-century eugenicist who is often cited as a founder of Planned Parenthood, recognized the moral truth that contraception was always preferable to abortion because "no matter how early [the abortion] was performed,

[cranked]

Satanic idolatry of Margaret Sanger returns to the forefront.......

[Salman]

They don't like the word "eugenics", but that has always been their deal.