Posted on 05/20/2022 7:39:58 PM PDT by bitt
Elon Musk called out an old Hillary Clinton tweet as a “hoax” Friday after a Twitter user flagged it for misleading disinformation and was ignored.
The tweet, written Oct. 31, 2016 during Clinton’s failed presidential campaign, is a statement issued in response to a news report about an alleged secret server at Trump Tower that was being used to covertly communicate with Russia.
“Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank,” Clinton wrote in the tweet alongside the statement issued by one of her then-top aides, Jake Sullivan.
A Twitter user tagged Musk in the message and wrote that they’ve reported it “as misleading disinformation” to the company but it was never taken down and does not have a warning label attached to it.
“I would be interested to know if, when you receive control over the company, anything was done with this at any level. Pls advise soonest,” the user wrote to Musk.
The Tesla CEO responded that they were “absolutely correct.”
“That tweet is a Clinton campaign hoax for which their campaign lawyer is undergoing a criminal trial,” Musk wrote, linking to a BBC story about the trial of Michael Sussman, Clinton’s 2016 campaign attorney.
SEE IMAGE
“.@paraga and @vijaya, what say you?” Musk wrote, tagging Parag Agrawal, Twitter’s CEO, and Vijaya Gadde, the company’s Legal, Policy and Trust Lead.
Sussman is accused of lying to the FBI when he met with an agent about former President Donald Trump’s alleged ties to Russia and prosecutors say he “manipulated” the agency in a misbegotten bid to snag the election.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
You think Musk founded Tesla? Bless your heart. You need to use a different search engine or find other news sources.
Important to find out who compiled those two thumb drives and white papers. WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT??
This onion needs peeling.
If Durham is as efficient as I think he is, we shall find out. All in good time.....all in good time.
Hell, hillary’s had people killed for less.
Fusion GPS is known to have compiled some of the fake evidence, especially the internet technical data from Georgia Tech internet researchers.
Doesn’t matter to them. Tesla is not an electric car company worth talking about to this administration.
Hopefully, we’ll be seeing some faces attached to the names...soon.
Musk was part of the team that got Tesla going and the 4th CEO, even if he wasn’t one of the original two. Musk has argued that he was a founder based on that.
Be that as it may, Alex Jones is no Elon Musk.
The names are pretty much all known.
It’s a laborious task to trace all the threads, but by now the names are known.
For insight into some perhaps lesser-known players, here’s a story from The Federalist some THREE years ago:
https://thefederalist.com/2019/03/08/35-key-people-involved-russia-hoax-need-investigated/
Wrong. Tesla does not exist, it is not even worth mentioning, as shown by this administration, since it is headed by a now disfavored figure.
Read this, Mister Troll:
Biden official shares insights after meeting with Tesla's Elon Musk in Giga Texas
Last month, United States Labor Secretary Marty Walsh paid a visit to Gigafactory Texas to speak with Tesla CEO Elon Musk.
https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-elon-musk-marty-walsh-visit-details/
No, that is what the SJWs are saying. Tesla does not exist. Gone from the S&P ESG index, gone from Biden’s White House forum, etc. Tesla is being erased.
Is that why The Labor Secretary just visited Tesla Gigafactory in Texas?
Tesla does not exist.
70% market share says Tesla DOMINATES.
Gone from the S&P ESG index,
S&P ESG index huh?
How much money is in S&P ESG? A measely $65 Billion.
Don't make me laugh.
gone from Biden's White House forum, etc.
GM was at the White House and then only managed to produce just a pathetic 26 EVs in Q4 2021.
Chuckle.
The Biden White House is a curse.
Tesla is being erased.
Tesla is getting stronger everywhere.
ELON MUSK TWITTER THREAD:
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1527748229470646272
Tesla is building a hardcore litigation department where we directly initiate & execute lawsuits. The team will report directly to me.
Please send 3 to 5 bullet points describing evidence of exceptional ability.
My commitment:
- We will never seek victory in a just case against us, even if we will probably win.
- We will never surrender/settle an unjust case against us, even if we will probably lose.
Please include links to cases you have tried
Looking for hardcore streetfighters, not white-shoe lawyers like Perkins or Cooley who thrive on corruption.
There will be blood.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4065155/posts?page=5#5
What more ya got?
All power to Tesla :-)
I’m loving this Musk guy right now.
L
Hard to believe we had all that information and nothing happened. Proving all of it is what takes time, I guess.
In that case Durham has done a good job, epecially in exposing Ole Hill.
The Federalist is the only publication that seems to have the best of Investigative Reporters. Just the News is good, but does not have as many on staff.
We can only guess what will happen now, but even if Sussman, because of the venue, is acquitted, Durham has some quality material to cause more to happen
God Bless Us All
Various underlings at the FBI testified they spotted the fakes quickly. Remains to be seen if senior FBI is asked in court why they claimed to Boente of the DOJ that the scam was real enough for official investigation
I sincerely feel that some FBI were “tainted” and they should receive the harshest punishment.
PS. I have loathed Christopher Wray since the first day I saw his approval as Director. I can see his arriving at work after his oath was administered, and gathering his staff and agents, and announcing ...”No worries, guys, I’m here.”
Makes me sick.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.