Posted on 05/15/2022 11:30:08 AM PDT by Kaslin
With literally hours to days to go in a landmark federal case before the Supreme Court, a tragic and peculiar shooting occurs leaving 13 innocent victims shot, 10 of them fatally.
Here’s what the media has already reported:
The shooter was white.
Most the shooter’s victims were black.
The shooter drove over 200 miles.
The shooter used an AR-15.
The shooter left behind a manifesto.
The shooter had planned the attack since January.
The shooter was going to take his life but surrendered.
The shooter lived in “Trump Country.”
In less than 24 hours the media has established that profile without the laptop owned by said shooter. The media claims the manifesto is so detailed that it provides absolute corroborated proof that the arrested is the shooter. That shooter used the “popular AR15” so commonly reported to be used in mass shootings — even on occasions when it has not been. And most importantly to the New York Times and the Washington Post, that “somehow” former President Trump’s name could be attached to the story. Hence why Zack Williams, Patrick Reilly in reporting the story were so eager to get a resident of the shooter’s hometown on the record to say said town was “Trump Country.”
The shooter who was filled with murderous contempt for his fellow citizens is being reduced to “being white.”
The circumstances that allowed him to be successful from stealing his parents car, to the stolen weapon he used, to act of killing his fellow citizens were crafted in a nation, state and municipality that are all exhibiting a “soft on crime” approach that serves no real inducement to not commit these acts.
All of this while the media uses this tragedy to blame a President who’s not in office, and a Supreme Court they wish to intimidate.
Make no mistake friends our nation is in a battle for our very soul, definition, and basic right to exist.
And when they have succeeded in taking away all the rights of lawful citizens, then the rights of the elected elites and the rights of the illegal and criminal that keep them there will be the only rights to still exist.
Prove me wrong.
Meanwhile there were 3 multiple shooters in Milwaukee after the NBA game.
The shooter was a leftist.
But the Ministry of Propaganda won’t mention that.
Pretty soon anyone who isn’t a lefty will be considered a criminal or traitor. Oh, wait, we already are.
If he used a SUV to run over as many white people as possible in a Christmas parade...
Media black hole and just a simple tragedy.
“Prove me wrong.”
That’s what Qtards say when challenged over some outlandish, bizarre claim nobody else has even thought about.
The shooter was an fbi patsy.
Wasn’t the manifesto something about Jews? Was he disappointed that Sammy Davis Junior was dead?
:" So much so that though they mention the fact that the shooter’s first victim was a “security guard” on site, they failed to mention that the security guard’s most lethal defense weapon was a flashlight."
--another post indicates that the guard shot at the perp but he (the perp) was wearing a bullet resistant vest--
Can you provide an actual example of a “Qtard” actually saying this on Free Republic? Maybe you could provide a link to where the rest of us could find the “Qtards” that you are complaining about.
Not in GA. We just passed Constitutional Carry.
“Only Criminals Will Have Guns”, and of course the federal oligarchy ... but I repeat.
Don’t recall race being mentioned at all in the Waukesha Massacre.
“Prove me wrong.”
Can’t, but may I add one little situation for you? He was streaming the attack on Twitch as it happened with a helmet camera. Twitch is owned by Amazon and it took 2 minutes past the completion of the stream to get it off. The animals are already out the door of the barn at that point.
But twitch took an action wrong or right:
“Twitch has a zero-tolerance policy against violence of any kind and works swiftly to respond to all incidents,” a Twitch spokesperson said in a statement. “The user has been indefinitely suspended from our service, and we are taking all appropriate action, including monitoring for any accounts rebroadcasting this content.”
https://abc7ny.com/buffalo-shooting-tops-supermarket-payton-gendron-multiple-people-shot/11852022/
How can you have a zero tolerance toward broadcasting something but not monitor it to stop it when it began and was broadcast in its entirety before you stopped it. That’s zero tolerance.
I don’t think removing the privilege of using the company for streaming will have much of an effect unless having a copy of it is good for creating a problem with the prosecution of the perp. It can additionally be used as a recruiting tool for whatever group the guy belongs to if he does. There is nothing anywhere I can find that this crime is a hate crime just because he shot people in a predominately black neighborhood. That is speculation, not evidence. Or lies to back the planned action no matter who did it. They can point a finger at one person and allow the guilty to get away with it if he was a member of a racial attack group which is what they are trying to portray.
Wy69
“Prove me wrong.”
Can’t, but may I add one little situation for you? He was streaming the attack on Twitch as it happened with a helmet camera. Twitch is owned by Amazon and it took 2 minutes past the completion of the stream to get it off. The animals are already out the door of the barn at that point.
But twitch took an action wrong or right:
“Twitch has a zero-tolerance policy against violence of any kind and works swiftly to respond to all incidents,” a Twitch spokesperson said in a statement. “The user has been indefinitely suspended from our service, and we are taking all appropriate action, including monitoring for any accounts rebroadcasting this content.”
https://abc7ny.com/buffalo-shooting-tops-supermarket-payton-gendron-multiple-people-shot/11852022/
How can you have a zero tolerance toward broadcasting something but not monitor it to stop it when it began and was broadcast in its entirety before you stopped it. That’s zero tolerance.
I don’t think removing the privilege of using the company for streaming will have much of an effect unless having a copy of it is good for creating a problem with the prosecution of the perp. It can additionally be used as a recruiting tool for whatever group the guy belongs to if he does. There is nothing anywhere I can find that this crime is a hate crime just because he shot people in a predominately black neighborhood. That is speculation, not evidence. Or lies to back the planned action no matter who did it. They can point a finger at one person and allow the guilty to get away with it if he was a member of a racial attack group which is what they are trying to portray.
Wy69
Your Ga State Supreme Court got the 2nd Amendment right back in 1846 when they made this decision on gun bans in that state.
. * Nunn v. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846).
“’The right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed.’ The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State.”
“Only Criminals Will Have Guns”
Oh I”m sure when the Democrats really start gun control they will disarm gangs, illegal aliens, and all other criminals first and the law abiding citizens ... Bwhahahahahahaha
Even our concealed carry permit is “shall issue” not “ may issue “.
When they outlaw guns only the police will have guns.
Of course they won’t. Did you expect them to?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.