Meanwhile there were 3 multiple shooters in Milwaukee after the NBA game.
The shooter was a leftist.
But the Ministry of Propaganda won’t mention that.
Pretty soon anyone who isn’t a lefty will be considered a criminal or traitor. Oh, wait, we already are.
If he used a SUV to run over as many white people as possible in a Christmas parade...
Media black hole and just a simple tragedy.
“Prove me wrong.”
That’s what Qtards say when challenged over some outlandish, bizarre claim nobody else has even thought about.
:" So much so that though they mention the fact that the shooter’s first victim was a “security guard” on site, they failed to mention that the security guard’s most lethal defense weapon was a flashlight."
--another post indicates that the guard shot at the perp but he (the perp) was wearing a bullet resistant vest--
Not in GA. We just passed Constitutional Carry.
“Only Criminals Will Have Guns”, and of course the federal oligarchy ... but I repeat.
“Prove me wrong.”
Can’t, but may I add one little situation for you? He was streaming the attack on Twitch as it happened with a helmet camera. Twitch is owned by Amazon and it took 2 minutes past the completion of the stream to get it off. The animals are already out the door of the barn at that point.
But twitch took an action wrong or right:
“Twitch has a zero-tolerance policy against violence of any kind and works swiftly to respond to all incidents,” a Twitch spokesperson said in a statement. “The user has been indefinitely suspended from our service, and we are taking all appropriate action, including monitoring for any accounts rebroadcasting this content.”
https://abc7ny.com/buffalo-shooting-tops-supermarket-payton-gendron-multiple-people-shot/11852022/
How can you have a zero tolerance toward broadcasting something but not monitor it to stop it when it began and was broadcast in its entirety before you stopped it. That’s zero tolerance.
I don’t think removing the privilege of using the company for streaming will have much of an effect unless having a copy of it is good for creating a problem with the prosecution of the perp. It can additionally be used as a recruiting tool for whatever group the guy belongs to if he does. There is nothing anywhere I can find that this crime is a hate crime just because he shot people in a predominately black neighborhood. That is speculation, not evidence. Or lies to back the planned action no matter who did it. They can point a finger at one person and allow the guilty to get away with it if he was a member of a racial attack group which is what they are trying to portray.
Wy69
“Prove me wrong.”
Can’t, but may I add one little situation for you? He was streaming the attack on Twitch as it happened with a helmet camera. Twitch is owned by Amazon and it took 2 minutes past the completion of the stream to get it off. The animals are already out the door of the barn at that point.
But twitch took an action wrong or right:
“Twitch has a zero-tolerance policy against violence of any kind and works swiftly to respond to all incidents,” a Twitch spokesperson said in a statement. “The user has been indefinitely suspended from our service, and we are taking all appropriate action, including monitoring for any accounts rebroadcasting this content.”
https://abc7ny.com/buffalo-shooting-tops-supermarket-payton-gendron-multiple-people-shot/11852022/
How can you have a zero tolerance toward broadcasting something but not monitor it to stop it when it began and was broadcast in its entirety before you stopped it. That’s zero tolerance.
I don’t think removing the privilege of using the company for streaming will have much of an effect unless having a copy of it is good for creating a problem with the prosecution of the perp. It can additionally be used as a recruiting tool for whatever group the guy belongs to if he does. There is nothing anywhere I can find that this crime is a hate crime just because he shot people in a predominately black neighborhood. That is speculation, not evidence. Or lies to back the planned action no matter who did it. They can point a finger at one person and allow the guilty to get away with it if he was a member of a racial attack group which is what they are trying to portray.
Wy69
“Only Criminals Will Have Guns”
Oh I”m sure when the Democrats really start gun control they will disarm gangs, illegal aliens, and all other criminals first and the law abiding citizens ... Bwhahahahahahaha
When they outlaw guns only the police will have guns.
The author say’s the rifle was stolen?
First I heard that. Would like some confirmation on that.
It’s a common saying that gun confiscation from law abiding citizens will result in only criminals having guns. But the government would still have them as well. Not sure which scares me most.