Posted on 05/14/2022 9:02:00 AM PDT by Altura Ct.
An ad from Calvin Klein on Mother's Day featuring a pregnant transgender man and his trans partner has sparked a wave of backlash on social media.
“Today, in support of women and mothers all over the world, we’re spotlighting the realities of new families," the company wrote in the caption of a Sunday Instagram post highlighting the campaign, which features three nontraditional families — including Brazilian reality stars Erika Fernandes and Roberto Bete.
“Erika Fernandes and Roberto Bete are expecting parents from Brazil. Roberto is due to give birth to his and Erika's son Noah any day now,” the caption continued alongside images that show Bete visibly pregnant, in Calvin Klein underwear, as his wife, wearing a CK sports bra and bottoms, clings to his arms at their bedside.
“We can reproduce biologically or from the heart…our place is to love and be loved,” the couple is quoted as saying in the ad.
Below, click through to see the ad as posted by Calvin Klein, in position No. 4:
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
Pray for those children. They are going through hell on earth.
These people are not just total idiots, they have a mental illness too.
And I hardly believe that child coming from body flooded with masculinizing hormones can ultimately be normal or healthy itself. Thus perpetuating cycle of abnormal gender crap
Turn them upside down and look.
If they get pregnant they are not men. PERIOD!!!
Dumb-a$$es!!
If they can get pregnant, they are not “men” in anyway shape or form.
I used to think insanity was just insane. It’s more. You can add tedious to some forms of insanity.
When confused on this, simply substitute “fake” for “trans” and it generally becomes much more clear.
thomas beatie was one of the first pregnant men in the media..and his life blew up. wife attacked him. mishandled children...divorced his wife
now he is a stock broker in phoenix. I guess according to some here the trans man works on Wall Street ....in Phoenix.
Penis at birth = male
Vagina at birth = female
Some folks are easily confused so I hope this clears it up for them.
You know what that reminds me of? The John Wayne Gacy story “To catch a killer” starring Brian Dennehy which is one of the most spine chilling TV shows ever broadcast. This is exactly what Gacy use to do, interview the boys then talk them into handcuffs as a magic trick, then once handcuffed he would rape and then torture them to death. Calvin Klein is one sick ass mofo, he damn well knew that’s what those commercials came across as.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105604/
A mutilated homosexual transvestite is still just a mutilated homosexual transvestite, never the opposite gender.
If you have female parts you are a woman, if you have male parts you are a man. Sorry, anything else is play acting.
All that it proves is testosterone spiking women are still women.
There is NO remaining grasp on reality from these woke idiots.
“Erika Fernandes and Roberto Bete are expecting parents from Brazil. Roberto is due to give birth to his and Erika’s son Noah any day now,”
Wait a minute. We can’t say this is their “son” Noah. They are doing exactly what they bitch about the rest of the world assigning a sex at birth. What if that child grows up to be transgender, or non binary or identify as any of the 50 plus gender identities discovered so far?
Trans men are women aren’t they? Or is it the other way around? So confusing!
I am confused too. Not only am I confused, but I also don’t want to know what a transwoman is or a transman.
I know that insolence will get me sent to reeducation camp someday. But with over 50 gender identities discovered so far, the average person can’t keep up.
Of course they can … THEY’RE STILL WOMEN!
What you really have is two dedicated transvestites, of opposite flavors.
The one with female body parts cannot get pregnant unless the normal female hormones are all in sync. And it has to be maintained throughout pregnancy. And the girly man has to have the original wedding tackle and hormonal balance to get her pregment.
Giving a pregnant woman enough testosterone to get that kind of hairgrowth would likely terminate the pregnancy, and/or play all kinds of developemental havoc with the fetus.
Gaslighting, they are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.