Maybe they could sell them to Russia. I hear they need ships
To: artichokegrower
2 posted on
05/11/2022 12:33:20 PM PDT by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
To: artichokegrower
Sell em to China.
Then they won’t need to copy much more
3 posted on
05/11/2022 12:33:46 PM PDT by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
To: artichokegrower
Cut the losses. They were a dumb idea to begin with.
To: artichokegrower
Except for the hull cracks and a propulsion system limiting the ship to the speed of a garbage scow, what’s not to like?
To: artichokegrower
What admirals approved the building of those Edsels of the Navy?!?
7 posted on
05/11/2022 12:36:12 PM PDT by
Carl Vehse
(A proud member of the LGBFJB community)
To: artichokegrower
Give them to the Philipines.
8 posted on
05/11/2022 12:37:03 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
((The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.))
To: artichokegrower
Scrap? Sounds like they’d be good for a strategic reserve.
9 posted on
05/11/2022 12:37:06 PM PDT by
glorgau
To: artichokegrower
The Little Crappy Ships were a failure from day one. They’re not big enough to be effective and the Navy hated them from the start.
13 posted on
05/11/2022 12:54:23 PM PDT by
FLT-bird
To: artichokegrower
Were ‘t these supposed to be the ships to replace the Iowa Class?
To: artichokegrower
15 posted on
05/11/2022 1:01:23 PM PDT by
Srednik
(Polyglot. Overeducated. Redeemed by Christ. Anticommunist from the womb.)
To: artichokegrower
To: artichokegrower
By all means lets increase the defense budget.
Thats sarcasm. The amount of money the DoD wastes is staggering. They should get a cut and learn to make better decisions. But of course that will never happen.
To: artichokegrower
Someone someplace in the USA could fix this and sell them back to the USA. Offer a billion dollar buy back clause and someone will figure it out.
30 posted on
05/11/2022 2:53:53 PM PDT by
wgmalabama
(We will find out if the Vac or virus risk was the correct choice -can put the truth above narrative )
To: artichokegrower
We are SENDING A MESSAGE to Russia and China, which is that we no longer need navel ships, since we now have the UN on our side.
31 posted on
05/11/2022 2:57:20 PM PDT by
BobL
(Putin isn't sending gays into our schools to groom my children, but anti-Putin people are)
To: artichokegrower
Saves Russia the trouble of wasting hypersonics on them.
32 posted on
05/11/2022 2:58:06 PM PDT by
BobL
(Putin isn't sending gays into our schools to groom my children, but anti-Putin people are)
To: artichokegrower
33 posted on
05/11/2022 3:28:24 PM PDT by
roving
To: artichokegrower
I watched a documentary on the battle in the Pacific during WWII.
They used a lot of naval gunfire during the amphibious operations.
Can the Navy still do that?
The Marines are giving up their tanks.
I read that they are thinking about giving up their artillery.
Is this smart?
35 posted on
05/11/2022 3:42:29 PM PDT by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer”)
To: artichokegrower
What about the LCS ships made by General Dynamics?
36 posted on
05/11/2022 3:49:02 PM PDT by
NY Attitude
(Make love not war but be prepared for either.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
