Posted on 05/08/2022 8:33:13 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
On Sunday, the Former Deputy prime minister of Russia, Dmitry Rogozin, threatened the Starlink founder for assisting Ukraine — “Elon Musk, thus, is involved in supplying the fascist forces in Ukraine with military communication equipment. And for this, Elon, you will be held accountable like an adult – no matter how much you’ll play the fool.”
“The word “Nazi” doesn’t mean what he seems to think it does,” Musk tweeted.”
If I die under mysterious circumstances, it’s been nice knowin ya
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 9, 2022
The word “Nazi” doesn’t mean what he seems to think it does pic.twitter.com/pk9SQhBOsG>
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 9, 2022
Where is the threat of assassination at?
I don't see it.
That was a masterful answer.
If you don’t mind, I am going to link to ot, reprint and refer to it as your answer in other threads?
“Any group could walk in and take a chunk and the only thing Russia could do to stop it is nuke “
Most of the land is permafrost.
As to the resources it iść cheaper to buy it rather than invade
“NATO and the EU have been pushing way too hard for years now to keep expanding both entities right up to Russia’s doorstep. “
What are you talking about?
To join either NATO or the EU, countries have to request it, then fulfil criteria.
Then, only I’d the other countries unanimously agree will ot be allowed to join.
Ukraine was rejected from NATO in 2004 as it didn’t have military under civilian control.
You think NATO forced Latvia, Estonia etc to join? They practically begged to join. And they implemented strict reforms to meet the criteria.
“The globalists are clearly on a mission to lock the last remaining muscular independent nations “ as the Ukraine war shows, Russia has the muscles of a 3 year old.
Russia and China are globalists. They want the world to be under their dominion
RE: Where is the threat of assassination at?
I don’t see it.
From Musk’s Tweet in response after reading Russia’s threat, he himself seems to understand it as a threat in his life.
A lot of Musk’s tweets are tongue in cheek and not to be taken literally.
There is no threat of assassination unless your understanding of English is different from mine.
Not just Latvia and Estonia; the following NATO countries also border Russia:
a. Poland
b. Lithuania
c. Norway
d. Extra points: territorial waters of the U.S.A.
e. Coming soon: Finland!
Regards,
Maybe you can tell me how much land the US has invaded and kept since then.
Few military powers would have been as patient as they were with what we and NATO did in Ukraine.
Which one of those events do you claim Biden
claimed was true, that isn’t true?
What part of what I said there isn’t true?
Do you agree with it?
Either way, it’s public record and I stand by it.
Thank you.
Russia is less then 100 miles from United States in places. Not once have we ever been attacked. Enough with the russia Russia Russia bs. It’s just a continuation of the globalists fake Russian collusion hoax. Also our government has murdered millions of innocent Iraqis and afghans through bombings and starvation causing trade restrictions. Putin can’t hold a candle to us . Is that why you hate him?
Millions huh?
You guys crack me up.
Ukraine was not “going to join NATO”. That issue was resolved already in 2008 when France and Germany both disapproved.
NATO membership applicants must receive unanimous approval by all other NATO members.
Those areas were a part of Mexico for 25 years. That’s when Mexico officially became Mexico just about 200 years ago. Spain left giving the land to Mexico, but the U S contested it.
It wasn’t a long term national holding going back hundreds or thousands of years. The local Native Americans owned the land. Mexico didn’t.
I believe Mexico was formed around 1825. The US went to war with Mexico.
We defeated it and the paid for the land. This was around 1850.
There was a secondary land purchase a few years later and the border was set.
Those that say we stole Mexico’s land don’t understand the history of the region.
Thanks Justa. I didn’t know that.
“That was a masterful answer.”
>Someone needed to say it, he did, and is spot on.
That’s not what “globalism” means. Russia and China would better be described as “imperialist”, though I don’t believe that today’s Russia is looking to dominate the world as the Soviet Union wanted to do, nor could they. China certainly is, though.
The globalists are those who speak in lofty terms of a “new world order”, in which “nationalism” will be replaced by a global government that unites all of the worlds’s nations, somewhat akin to Star Trek’s Federation. The promise is that this will ensure peace and prosperity for all, and will eliminate the devastating wars of the past that were caused by disputes and competition between sovereign nations. Of course, the reality is that this promise is only a smokescreen for the ultimate tyrannical government that will enslave every person on Earth.
The two countries other than China that still hold the tightest to national sovereignty and self-determination are Russia and the United States, and a global government cannot be implemented until our two countries are either absorbed into the collective or are destroyed. There cannot be anywhere for the subjects of the global tyranny to escape to, which makes the United States in particular the number one target of the globalists. Russia is a target more for the fact that it simply won’t go along with the global collective, and insists upon protecting and even expanding what it deems its sovereign territory.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.