Posted on 05/06/2022 10:08:01 AM PDT by rktman
I agree, and McCormic ain’t much batter, shame Trump didn’t endorse Kathy, now that the voters are finally starting to see her they are liking what they see, just don’t know if there is enough time left for her to have a chance, but I am hopeful...
She certainly has made an impression quickly with the exposure the debates gave her, but will it be enough? She doesn’t have the cash or deep pockets that the 2 front runners have.. however I remain HOPEFUL she will pull off the upset.
I'll remind you of my Post #58 on that same thread you linked from March 1st:
This country was worse off in 2008 than it was in 2000. When GWB left office we had sizable Democratic majorities in the House and Senate, along with a jug-eared exchange student from Kenya in the White House.
And let's remember that GWB himself was as much of an obstacle in the "transactional wins" you describe. If there had been any doubt about what that moron brought to the table, it should have been dispelled when he was faced with a Supreme Court vacancy that gave him an opportunity to make long-lasting progress for the conservative cause, and his first instinct was to nominate a mediocrity like Harriet Miers to the court.
THE END.
1. She's a political neophyte.
2. She has no money.
3. In a state where elections are won and lost in the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh suburbs, she lost her only previous election in suburban Philadelphia to a Democrat mediocrity.
Item #1 wouldn't be a big deal, except that it's not like she migrated into politics after a successful career on her own. When you have never won an election and your current job title is listed as "Fox News Political Commentator," you aren't exactly bringing anything to the table that gives people any confidence in you.
Lots of candidates lose their first time around. Many of the party candidates are encouraged to first enter and compete in a race they don’t have much chance of winning in order to get the experience and name recognition for their next shot. She got that campaign experience previously. In fact, she has more campaign experience than her two main competitors—and she just beat out those longtime professional gum flappers in her debate.
Listen to her speak and you can tell she’s got a lot on the ball. Had Trump backed her, she’d have sufficient money.
The reports that Trump has had aides selling his endorsements to high bidders are very unfortunate, since her two main competitors are clearly globalist/uniparty plants.
She’s running 3rd and only a few points behind the “leaders” who have each spent tens of millions if not more over the last 4 months…. Fact she has no money is biggest issue she absolutely has been the person who has benefited the most from the exposure the debates gave her but no cash to capitalize on it..
OZ and McCormic are both horrible and weak… sadly odds are one of them will be the candidate but I hold out hope she pulls off the upset, because these other two are just another in a long line of blah the GOP of PA has offered for decades.
What is wrong with Laxalt? Wasn’t his grandfather a great senator for Nevada?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.