1. She's a political neophyte.
2. She has no money.
3. In a state where elections are won and lost in the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh suburbs, she lost her only previous election in suburban Philadelphia to a Democrat mediocrity.
Item #1 wouldn't be a big deal, except that it's not like she migrated into politics after a successful career on her own. When you have never won an election and your current job title is listed as "Fox News Political Commentator," you aren't exactly bringing anything to the table that gives people any confidence in you.
Lots of candidates lose their first time around. Many of the party candidates are encouraged to first enter and compete in a race they don’t have much chance of winning in order to get the experience and name recognition for their next shot. She got that campaign experience previously. In fact, she has more campaign experience than her two main competitors—and she just beat out those longtime professional gum flappers in her debate.
Listen to her speak and you can tell she’s got a lot on the ball. Had Trump backed her, she’d have sufficient money.
The reports that Trump has had aides selling his endorsements to high bidders are very unfortunate, since her two main competitors are clearly globalist/uniparty plants.
She’s running 3rd and only a few points behind the “leaders” who have each spent tens of millions if not more over the last 4 months…. Fact she has no money is biggest issue she absolutely has been the person who has benefited the most from the exposure the debates gave her but no cash to capitalize on it..
OZ and McCormic are both horrible and weak… sadly odds are one of them will be the candidate but I hold out hope she pulls off the upset, because these other two are just another in a long line of blah the GOP of PA has offered for decades.