Posted on 04/28/2022 7:50:16 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Insane as it is that the Department of Homeland Security has created a Disinformation Governance Board, it’s utter madness that the woman running it is Nina Jankowicz, who’s a veteran disinfo spreader.
She embraced and promoted the bogus Clinton-campaign-created Trump-Russia dossier. And she waged war on The Post’s true and accurate reporting of Hunter Biden’s laptop.
As our first laptop stories ran, The Associated Press reported: “Disinformation experts say there are multiple red flags that raise doubts about their authenticity, including questions about whether the laptop actually belongs to Hunter Biden, said Nina Jankowicz.”
She also told the AP: “We should view it as a Trump campaign product.”
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
It clearly says from the “Post Editorial Board”, why would you think its not an editorial?
I thought it was an editorial, but I was explaining that it also had some characteristics of news articles. Don’t try to read my mind.
Excellent!
The Left doesn’t even care at this point. It’s a full court press...
X100
The left doesn’t even care if something is unconstitutional. Doesn’t care how un-american something is. It’s full steam ahead to total power for the left, by any means necessary. Im still waiting for the day when we take the fight to them. I mean, really fight these Pieces OF S.
Their Naming committee
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Okay guys, how do we say Ministry of Truth without actually saying Ministry of Truth?
I agre with the following....
The internet in general, examples being Wikipedia and Twitter, really isn’t a place to get information on whole, but rather a place to get an idea of what you should ‘research further’. .....The spread of disinformation/ misinformation or lies is never the true problem.....
....the ‘lack of critical thinking in regards to processing information is the true problem’.... People will take a single piece of information, which should be the start of their research journey, and assume that it is instead the destination.
Generally, Wikipedia is more trustworthy when the info is not related to
political topics. I agree with your take on it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.