Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

I agre with the following....

The internet in general, examples being Wikipedia and Twitter, really isn’t a place to get information on whole, but rather a place to get an idea of what you should ‘research further’. .....The spread of disinformation/ misinformation or lies is never the true problem.....

....the ‘lack of critical thinking in regards to processing information is the true problem’.... People will take a single piece of information, which should be the start of their research journey, and assume that it is instead the destination.


67 posted on 04/29/2022 10:37:13 AM PDT by caww ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: caww

Generally, Wikipedia is more trustworthy when the info is not related to
political topics. I agree with your take on it.


68 posted on 04/29/2022 12:09:10 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson