Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CEO: Boeing Should Have Rejected Trump’s Air Force One Deal
Defense One ^ | Wednesday, 27 April 2022 | Marcus Weisgerber

Posted on 04/27/2022 12:41:02 PM PDT by CodeToad

The company revealed that it has lost $660 million outfitting the next presidential jets—so far.

Boeing should have rejected then-President Donald Trump’s proposed terms to build two new Air Force One aircraft, the company’s CEO said Wednesday.

Dave Calhoun spoke Wednesday on the company’s quarterly earnings call, just hours after Boeing disclosed that it has lost $660 million transforming two 747 airliners into flying White Houses.

“Air Force One I'm just going to call a very unique moment, a very unique negotiation, a very unique set of risks that Boeing probably shouldn't have taken,” Calhoun said. “But we are where we are, and we're going to deliver great airplanes.”

Then-President Trump, an aviation enthusiast, took a keen interest in the new presidential jets, involving himself in everything from contract negotiations to the plane’s color scheme. As part of the deal, Boeing signed a fixed-price contract that required the company, not taxpayers, to pay for any cost overruns during the complicated conversion of the two airliners.

In February 2018, the Air Force signed a nearly $4 billion deal with Boeing to convert two 747-8 airliners into a VIP configuration with conference rooms, sleeping quarters, communications gear, and amenities that allow the president to work as if he were at the White House. Along with other costs related to building the planes—for instance, a new hangar complex at Joint Base Andrews just outside of Washington—the Air Force One program is expected to cost taxpayers $5.3 billion.

When the deal was finalized, the White House claimed Trump’s negotiations saved taxpayers $1.4 billion. Boeing’s struggles to build the new planes might in fact save taxpayers more than that when the planes are finally delivered.

(Excerpt) Read more at defenseone.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: boeing; chat; chatforum; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last
To: Magnatron

They negotiated away cost overruns on a multi year contract.


81 posted on 04/27/2022 2:49:46 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (Contempt is the essential tool of the tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Exactly my point.


82 posted on 04/27/2022 3:04:05 PM PDT by CodeToad (Arm up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
Contracts have consequences.

Yeah, but this may be just the opening salvo of Boeing getting three times as much money as they agreed to from Biden.

83 posted on 04/27/2022 3:18:58 PM PDT by libertylover (Our BIGGEST problem, by far, is that most of the media is hate & agenda driven, not truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Trump had leverage because he knew the truth about Boeing: its business model relies on special privileges and subsidies from the US government that Trump could endanger. Moreover, Airbus would have gladly provided a winning money-losing bid for Air Force One just to tout the award as proof that its airliners are the best in the world.


84 posted on 04/27/2022 3:20:41 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

“ Trump made a great deal for the taxpayers”

Should have been the headline


85 posted on 04/27/2022 3:40:41 PM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

But they didn’t have to kick back to Trump. That saved some bucks.


86 posted on 04/27/2022 3:45:24 PM PDT by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

🤣


87 posted on 04/27/2022 3:46:56 PM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Boeing to add Hunter Biden to Board of Directors


88 posted on 04/27/2022 3:50:22 PM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Obama One?

Or is that racisis?


89 posted on 04/27/2022 4:05:10 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 3RIVRS

Boeing AF1’s should be a known quantity for Boeing.


90 posted on 04/27/2022 4:07:16 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Cuttnhorse

True enough and the DOD has elevated the practice to an art form.


91 posted on 04/27/2022 4:09:33 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: fightin kentuckian

20 years ago, Boeing had a habit of hiring at $65/hr and then laying people off for 8 months, rinse, repeat. It’s a wonder anyone bothered to work there. Other companies hired for less, but worked their people all year long. Boeing did that for years.


92 posted on 04/27/2022 4:52:35 PM PDT by PrairieLady2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

“The Art of The Deal?”


93 posted on 04/27/2022 5:20:05 PM PDT by Taxman (SAVE AMERICA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

The Deep State will bail out Boeing with “change orders” that really are not.


94 posted on 04/27/2022 5:57:39 PM PDT by gunnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: ETCM

The core competency of all federal contractors IS strategic incompetence.

And the government is a full blown enabler. And most of the time that’s exactly what is intended.


95 posted on 04/27/2022 6:04:46 PM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

THE ART OF THE DEAL

BOEING & others depend on contract changes over everything.

NOT this time.


96 posted on 04/27/2022 6:11:04 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

Prolly right about that. a few well placed “donations” and the contract issue will be resolved in Boeing’s favor. Its how DC works and Boeing knows well how to play the game.


97 posted on 04/28/2022 7:05:29 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...
Boeing should try to operate within a budget when doing work for the gov't.
98 posted on 04/28/2022 9:26:44 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
...which means it is also an opportunity for the contractor to recover some of its earlier losses.

Maybe with government contracts, but not on the ones I was involved with. The only wiggle room I allowed was a bit of fudging on length of time the CO would add to the completion schedule.

99 posted on 04/28/2022 11:12:48 AM PDT by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson