Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What is not being said here is that masking for the past 2 years was essentially ineffective because of inferior (e.g., cloth) masks.
1 posted on 04/25/2022 11:13:59 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: where's_the_Outrage?

“ led some people on social media to express their concerns for immunocompromised passengers.”

Concern trolls are concerned. Bubble Boy’s problems are not mine.


32 posted on 04/25/2022 11:29:31 AM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Growing up playing outside in the ‘70s and ‘80s, developing a proper immune system might have helped.


33 posted on 04/25/2022 11:29:50 AM PDT by real saxophonist (Hoplophobia will never be in the DSM, because the DSM is written by hoplophobes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

To be REALLY safe I recommend wearing a Level-A Containment Suit and a SCBU at all times.


34 posted on 04/25/2022 11:31:57 AM PDT by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

36 posted on 04/25/2022 11:39:48 AM PDT by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

How about all the plastic particles that the masks put in your lungs?


37 posted on 04/25/2022 11:41:03 AM PDT by stockpirate (Where Justice Ends Tyranny Begins...Repression Breeds Violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

just a snippet from this incredibly unscientific study:

his study used a test-negative case-control design, enrolling persons who received a positive (case-participants) or negative (control-participants) SARS-CoV-2 test result, from among all California residents, without age restriction, who received a molecular test result for SARS-CoV-2 during February 18–December 1, 2021 (5). Potential case-participants were randomly selected from among all persons who received a positive test result during the previous 48 hours and were invited to participate by telephone. For each enrolled case-participant, interviewers enrolled one control-participant matched by age group, sex, and state region; thus, interviewers were not blinded to participants’ SARS-CoV-2 infection status. Participants who self-reported having received a previous positive test result (molecular, antigen, or serologic) or clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 were not eligible to participate. During February 18–December 1, 2021, a total of 1,528 case-participants and 1,511 control-participants were enrolled in the study among attempted calls placed to 11,387 case- and 17,051 control-participants (response rates were 13.4% and 8.9%, respectively).

After obtaining informed consent from participants, interviewers administered a telephone questionnaire in English or Spanish. All participants were asked to indicate whether they had been in indoor public settings (e.g., retail stores, restaurants or bars, recreational facilities, public transit, salons, movie theaters, worship services, schools, or museums) in the 14 days preceding testing and whether they wore a face mask or res


38 posted on 04/25/2022 11:41:09 AM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

LOL. “CNN medical analyst”


39 posted on 04/25/2022 11:41:35 AM PDT by subterfuge (I'm a pure-blood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Well, as I sit here in a plane, 90% aren’t wearing masks....although a couple has their 3 young kids wearing masks AND a plastic faceshield. Smh.

I thought the polls said 60% will continue choosing to wear them.

BS.


40 posted on 04/25/2022 11:41:48 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

The true test: If masks were effective mask makers would warrant their use...want to bet that any manufacturer would do that? Get the Fauci flu and sue the mask maker for a million!!!


43 posted on 04/25/2022 11:44:51 AM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Use cash as much as possible, avoid cashless businesses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Maybe Slow Joe will come out and say that mask makers are the only industry that can produce a defective product and not be sued!


45 posted on 04/25/2022 11:46:05 AM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Use cash as much as possible, avoid cashless businesses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

IF mask wearing worked no one in Japan would ever get sick


46 posted on 04/25/2022 11:46:20 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

There is no way all the people I see walking around with masks still on are immunocompromised. Neurotic perhaps, but not immunocompromised.


50 posted on 04/25/2022 11:52:32 AM PDT by Clarancebeaks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
I have suggested to several Mask Nazis that they don a plastic bag over their head and Really be safe, as a side benefit, they can reduce their future carbon footprint to zero!
51 posted on 04/25/2022 11:54:08 AM PDT by ExSES (the "bottomhttps://youtu.be/ycrqXJYf1SU-line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Dr. Ashish Jha, Fauci’s replcacement at the Whitehouse has now clarified the matter....”If you are wearing a good mask and even if no one around you is wearing a mask, you are well protected against Covid.”


53 posted on 04/25/2022 11:58:47 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

All this garbo despite study after study overseas indicating that masks did NOTHING to prevent COVID. Yeah, okie dokie.

Keep wearing that face diaper placebo.........


55 posted on 04/25/2022 11:59:18 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Standard face masks will not even stop a particle of sheetrock dust that is at least 10 times larger than a particle of corona virus.

Makes you wonder which government officials have a financial investment in companies that manufacture and/or sell face masks.


56 posted on 04/25/2022 12:01:15 PM PDT by Iron Munro ( Joe Biden - Inventor Of The First New Language since Esperanto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

People can wear them as a groin cup,or as a hat, for all I care.


57 posted on 04/25/2022 12:01:27 PM PDT by Leep (Freedom: "What's the big deal" -joe biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Some medical experts, including Leana Wen, M.D., a public health professor at George Washington University and CNN medical analyst hack and pusher of lies

Fixed it.

58 posted on 04/25/2022 12:05:54 PM PDT by sauropod ("We put all our politicians in prison as soon as they are elected. Don’t you?" Why? "It saves time.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

I have no problem with other people wearing a mask. Most of them are ugly as hell anyway.


60 posted on 04/25/2022 12:17:48 PM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
When both people wore surgical masks, the risk of infection remained below 30% after one hour but was just 0.4% when both people wore a well-fitting filtering facepiece mask.

Then wearing two masks should be nearly as effective?

61 posted on 04/25/2022 12:26:50 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT ("The enemy has overrun us. We are blowing up everything. Vive la France!"Dien Bien Phu last message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson