Skip to comments.
Trump Weighs Into Prince Harry/Meghan Markle mMess
NY Post ^
| April 24, 2022
| Jorge Fitz-Gibbon
Posted on 04/25/2022 8:22:44 AM PDT by rod5591
Former President Donald Trump says Prince Harry is “an embarrassment” for turning his back on Buckingham Palace — and predicted the runaway royal’s controversial marriage to Meghan Markle will have a “bad” ending.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: princeharry; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: silverleaf
Perhaps Trump is pointing to a problem that is bigger than it seems, that is not just a family problem for the Queen.
21
posted on
04/25/2022 8:42:13 AM PDT
by
Bigg Red
(Trump will be sworn in under a shower of confetti made from the tattered remains of the Rat Party.)
To: Pirate Ragnar
To: rod5591
He noticed someone other than himself was getting attention, and he can’t bear that. “Bride at every wedding, corpse at every funeral,” as they say.
23
posted on
04/25/2022 8:44:15 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
(Nature, art, silence, simplicity, peace. And fungi.)
To: Dilbert San Diego
True he’s not a politician. he does things his own way, that’s for sure. And it’s part of his appeal. But it also is part of why he is less effective enacting his ideas than he should be.
To: Bigg Red
Another conspiracy, another pedo, another 3D chess move 🎉 At some point there will be a real conspiracy and real pedo’s and noone will believe you. Cried wolf too much.
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Actually I think Megs and Jussie Smollett would be a good couple.
To: M_Continuum
I'll see your "amen" and raise you one.
Amen, amen.
(Re. DeSantis)
27
posted on
04/25/2022 8:46:50 AM PDT
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never, never, never...in nothing, great or small...Winston Churchill)
To: Trump Girl Kit Cat
I hope you are right. As of now, I don’t see any reason for him to say anything at all about celebrities like those 2.
To: Republican Wildcat
Apparently MM has hired a consultant...someone who helped Obama. She has big plans for herself.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4a04UQu89Q
You’d think she’d be happy with going from rags to riches but apparently it isn’t enough for her ego.
29
posted on
04/25/2022 8:47:30 AM PDT
by
Aria
To: rod5591
30
posted on
04/25/2022 8:50:00 AM PDT
by
peggybac
(My will is what I wanted. God's will is what I got.)
To: irishjuggler
Megs will need to get an attachment before Jussie would look at her twice.
To: rod5591
Possibly because one or more Deep States are involved?
Because the House of Windsor has a metastatic Epstein Problem?
Because Harry may be here on a visa that allows the Harkles to get out of paying US income taxes?
I can think of more.
Deep States have a dog in this hunt for a reason.
32
posted on
04/25/2022 8:53:05 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
To: gibsonguy
Results will show this one way or the other beginning in may during primary time.
33
posted on
04/25/2022 8:53:31 AM PDT
by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016 democratic )
To: Seaplaner
A candidate I can get behind 🔥
To: Pirate Ragnar
—< Trump certainly has other more important things to do>
Trump knows controversy attracts media coverage like blood attracts sharks.
If the media covers trump, he is sucking the air out of the room for any other candidate.
He also knows his base agrees.
Trump has always used this technique.
During the primaries, the only questions other candidates got were requests to talk about the things trump said.
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
LOL... and when their periods sync, lookout!!!
36
posted on
04/25/2022 9:10:42 AM PDT
by
Chode
(there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
To: RoosterRedux
“Because he loves to...and he can.
Let Trump be Trump.”
Exactly. Remember President Trump is not a politician.
To: napscoordinator
To: pepsi_junkie
“I would,” he said. “The only thing I disagree with the Queen on probably one of the only things ever is that I think she would have said, ‘If that’s your choice, fine. But you now longer have titles.’ You know?
My Canadian wife tells me that the Queen is not unilaterally allowed to removed Harry's title of Prince. That would take "Counsellor of State", which is down a spot with Phillip's death, and the Queen possibly being unable to function in the near future. I think the Royal Family is trying to keep a bullet in the chamber, but it has been pointless so far with the Markles.
39
posted on
04/25/2022 9:25:07 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(“...we would live very well without Facebook."-B.LeMaire)
To: rod5591
Meaghan will dump Harry for a Saudi prince/someone wealthier.
40
posted on
04/25/2022 10:03:44 AM PDT
by
ronniesgal
(if more folks would mind their own business the world would be a better place.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson