Posted on 04/23/2022 7:51:04 AM PDT by marcusmaximus
What would yhe world do without the good ole Daily Mail. A source that keeps on giving you something to post. LOL
How about this story?
You’ll be dead of old age soon.
Enjoy wasting your last days talking shit online to anonymous people.
Boy are you dense. I said the person you replied to, that was gleeaikin, NOT ME. Try reading comprehension claases.
If you served in the Army in 1966, you are old.
Boy are you dense.
“If you served in the Army in 1966,”
But one problem genius, I have never posted that. Are you doing drugs?
I wish I was on drugs. Wrong argument with someone else.
Here’s from their homepage.
Grandmother, 2 sons, one in the military. He served in Gulf War 1 from Aug. 1990 to April 1991 with an airborne tank unit. In early September,2006, he returned from 8 months in Afghanistan, again in 2013, and 2020. My late husband served three years in Korea during the worst of it.
Not her homepage. I’m saying I was arguing with someone else on a different thread and confused him and you.
I just started it three months ago.
You’re calling someone out when you called a gramma a p^$$y In post 104. Very hypocritical of you.
Quit squawking like a seagull...
Quit acting like a troll.
You are correct.
Do you support Joe Biden as POTUS?
Grab it and run ping.
Too late Pooty, Seal Team 6 has already plundered every locker of the Moskva, and in thier imitable style, left you little calling cards like : “ Vacant missile silo courtesy of The Republic of Ukraine”
Correct in your assessment. However, I would add that given modern capabilities short of nukes, but including bioweapons and chemical weapons, if the security structure largely imposed by the West (lead by the US) breaks down, most of humankind is probably hosed anyway. MOST likely, if nukes somehow are not in major play, IMO, we get to the year 2300 with maybe 2 billion people left, 1 billion in China (and China takes most of central and eastern Russia.) Somewhat less likely is a population not too dissimilar in numbers from today, mostly techno-enslaved in something closer to North Korea than China of 2022, except for the far superior technologies of surveillance and control.
Of course nukes almost certainly will be in major play, and likely repeatedly, so results generally look to be far worse. Unless... We might still fall into a techno-slavery world.
“There’s no carbon in the trees cut down for her keel? The pitch and tar? Ropes? Canvas? All of that is carbon-free?”
No, it is not carbon free, but the carbon is sequestered in trees and such. This is considered in the carbon footprint.
Biologic carbon sequestration refers to storage of atmospheric carbon in vegetation, soils, woody products, and aquatic environments. For example, by encouraging the growth of plants—particularly larger plants like trees—advocates of biologic sequestration hope to help remove CO2 from the atmosphere
https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/whats-difference-between-geologic-and-biologic-carbon-sequestration
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.