Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Petrosius; Cronos; buwaya
You emotional cripples just don't get the gravity of what you're pushing, do you?

ZERO evidence, coupled with questionable abilities of the Ukrainians.

I relent. You're ALL right and I am wrong.

The evidence supporting the Ukrainian sinking of the Moskva with Neptun missals [sic] is prolific and, frankly, OVERWHELMING:

Video Shows Russia's Moskva Cruiser Hit by Ukraine's Neptune Missiles - Newsweek

U.S. to train Ukrainian troops, confirms attack sank Russian warship - Washington Post

Cruiseship Moskva is on fire! “Burning right now” — Presidential Adviser Oleksiy Arestovych has confirmed the attack on the Russian cruiser “Moskva” by Ukrainian Neptune missiles.

Russian battleship Moskva sunk after getting direct hit by Ukrainian anti-ship missile || ARMA 3

Moskva Cruiser Sinks in Black Sea Hours After Russia Denies Missile Strike

BREAKING: The Russian cruiser 'Moskva' has just been hit by two Ukrainian Neptune missiles.

Ukrainian military hits Russian cruiser by Neptune missiles

TB2 drone shows the moment the Russian battleship Moskva being hit by Neptune missiles || ARMA 3.

Drone Video footage Of Moskva Cruiser Hit With Neptune Missile

Moskva Russian ship gets destroyed | Ukraine war video footage 2022 | Ukraine heavy combat

There is a video on Twitter purporting to show the actual strike of the missiles on the ship. a Twitter account belonging to Oleksiy Arestovych an advisor to President Zelensky is shown below

Truth be told, this is all propagandist PRON.

(you can clean your own monitors)

US DOD said the Moskva was about 60 miles off Odessa; OSINT (propagandists' favorite acronym) satellite imagery placed it 93 miles off Odessa; that's a major discrepancy.

According to Turkish 'sources' (many of whom are abject propagandists), the Moskva was lying on its side 74 minutes after the alleged attack, and sank less than 3 hours after it was allegedly hit by 2 missiles.

In contrast, Pentagon press secretary John Kirby said the Moskva was "afloat" and under her own power toward Sevastopol.

Hmmm...

I could expend HOURS documenting the contradictions, including data which shows a US Global Hawk in the area. In spite of both of your hysterical claims and straw man performances, I do harbor a minority opinion that a Ukranian missile attack was possible, but in terms of sheer information available, it is 99.9% propaganda to 0.1% facts with ZERO physical evidence of a missile attack.

Fact-checking footage claiming to show recent attack on Russian warship Moskva

And I'm pretty sure that Ukraine has no "missals" at all.

"Undisputed facts"; Indeed.

/s


128 posted on 04/15/2022 9:22:42 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: logi_cal869; Petrosius

you guys need to get your Kremlin stories straight.

First it was that there was a fire and it sank.

Now that oh the Americans fired.

Nope - you really want a war with the USA but you’re getting your butts kicked by Ukraine!


129 posted on 04/16/2022 2:36:56 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: logi_cal869; Petrosius
logi I relent. You're ALL right and I am wrong.

dude - if everyone see's things as "Putin's invasion", "Putin's Moskva sank" and there are multiple video evidences, and you still disagree with everyone, you should examine yourself, shouldn't you?

132 posted on 04/19/2022 12:25:10 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson