Posted on 04/12/2022 9:10:30 AM PDT by rktman
It's a given that inner city and urban schools with predominantly, cough-cough, African-American student bodies and African-American oversight are producing massively under-educated and ill-prepared graduates compared to suburban and private schools.
But, perhaps if they taught factual history, the students would grow up knowing: In 1840, 1844 and 1848, the Democratic Party stated as a platform:"All efforts by abolitionists … to interfere with questions of slavery … are calculated to lead to the most alarming and dangerous consequences and … have an inevitable tendency to diminish the happiness of the people and endanger the stability and permanency of the Union. …" ("Democrats and Republicans In Their Own Words: 124 Year History") For those not versed in political speak, the verbiage was a threat to destroy the Union if there were any effort to abolish slavery and/or permit blacks (and women) to enjoy equal rights under the Constitution.
Nathan Bedford Forest formed the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) in 1865 to protect Southerners from Northern carpetbaggers. It was the Democratic Party who co-opted the KKK, transmogrifying it into a terrorist group. With factual history the party would know: "The years from 1865-1868 were marked not by profound peace – as Democrats … claim – but rather by profound violence, with numerous deadly mob attacks against African-Americans." ("Democrats and Republicans: In Their Own Words," page 6; footnote ++)
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
“Following his logic the only reason Obama won in 2008 was because he was black, which if that were to be accepted would suggest they could win presidential elections in perpetuity by simply trotting out a color. ”
Not exactly. Barry won because he was black. It was “time for a black President.” “It was historic”. There was NEVER one peep about his policy. All that was known about him was obfuscated by the media. All that was needed to be known was he was black and that’s all that matters or you are racist. ANY criticism in ANY capacity was automatically construed as racist. They had one shot at that. Barry was a disgrace. The next black won’t win on his blackness alone. We’ve paid that debt.
My kin fought on the union side. Waiting for a check from rev. al.
😴😴😴😴😴😴😴
Actually, Obama was grey (Half black/Half white.
Actually, Obama was grey (Half black/Half white.
The Democrats created the KKK to keep blacks from voting.
While I agree in sentiment that is not the effective case of what we see, what we WILL see in perpetuity.
We just got new Justice on the USSC on the basis of being black and having a vagina. That 1619 Project and all the other white-guilt machinations will see to it. The pandering left of the soft bigotry of low expectations will ensure that the '400 years' will translate to millennia....
Also===NOT NBC qualified.
“We just got new Justice on the USSC on the basis of being black and having a vagina.”
A pandering appointment by a corrupt executive. She would never have been elected based on her color and genitalia. I believe most people were outraged upon hearing of her leniency towards child porn perverts, but of course no one cares what the people think. Strict party line vote, with the exception of the three despicable RINOs, from whom we would expect no less. I agree that this sort of thing has gone too far. These “historic occasions” make me want to puke.
bkmk
It was abraham lincoln comment that has long caused me to go hmmm.
He said “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”
He meant that a nation that was half slave and half free could not stand.
So we had a civil war. That war has continued to this day. Why? Why wasn’t it resolved by the civil war of 1861-1865.
By condemning the one part he condemned the whole.
How did this happen. I don’t think Lincoln understood the context of the quote.
Consider Lincoln’s quote above. He was quoting from scripture. Here is what the scripture reads.
Matthew 12:20-30
22 Then they brought him a demon-possessed man who was blind and mute, and Jesus healed him, so that he could both talk and see. 23 All the people were astonished and said, “Could this be the Son of David?”
24 But when the Pharisees heard this, they said, “It is only by Beelzebul, the prince of demons, that this fellow drives out demons.”
25 Jesus knew their thoughts and said to them, “Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every city or household divided against itself will not stand. 26 If Satan drives out Satan, he is divided against himself. How then can his kingdom stand? 27 And if I drive out demons by Beelzebul, by whom do your people drive them out? So then, they will be your judges. 28 But if it is by the Spirit of God that I drive out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you.
29 “Or again, how can anyone enter a strong man’s house and carry off his possessions unless he first ties up the strong man? Then he can plunder his house.
30 “Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters.
Nice. Thank you.
Maybe. Depends on whether it was the spirit of God or the spirit of satan who won the civil war.
either way. the war seems to rage on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.