Posted on 04/11/2022 12:28:02 PM PDT by janetjanet998
BIDEN: "I know it's controversial but I got it done once—ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines!"
"What do you think the deer you're hunting wear Kevlar vests? What the hell ya need 20 bullets for? You must be a hell of a terrible shot. No, I'm serious. Think about it."
Harvesting venison is just one reason to bear arms.
I miss the deer article of the 2nd Amendment?
To protect us from the government. G. Washington said so.
I guess he’d rather hunters use single shot barrel-load rifles?
Should I believe Biden is an expert on deer hunting? Last week I heard him claim he used to drive an eighteen-wheeler.
So with continued record breaking NICS checks, how many of the people who purchased firearms over the past two years, after seeing chaos in the cities, do you think will just turn them over to the government? How many people who have owned firearms all their lives will just casually turn them over because Biden says so? The guns aren’t going to just disappear on their own. Someone has to “come and get it”.
Who is going to bell the cat?
You can only put 3 of ‘em in your AR (just like any rifle in modern gun season) anyway...for deer hunting in KY. But 20 plus are needed for ‘varmints’. Stupid Hairy Legged Joe...
The framers gave us the Second Amendment not so we could go deer or duck hunting but to give us a modicum of protection against congressional tyranny. — Walter E. Williams
I’ll have to say but one time while my 270 was being repaired at the gun shop, I took my 1973 .223 Ruger Mini-14 deer hunting and shot a running doe being chased by deer dogs. Unfortunately I did shoot about 8 times rapidly until I hit her and brought her down. She was quite at a distance.
Good ole Joe. When things get tough, count on him to return to ‘Old Faithful’.... another gun ban.
No, Joe, you aren’t getting one. Suck it.
Zelensky wants to arm citizens, as they are an essential part of defending their sovereignty.
Having weapons is about protecting yourself and your family against government tyranny or other aggressors. If there was no need for guns, there would be no need for locks on our doors, or alarm systems, or the secret service for that matter. If human beings, AND governments could be trusted implicitly, we wouldn't need a military, and we wouldn't be talking about the need to protect the Ukraine at this point in history.
No one should ever cede, to any government, control of their lives and/or freedom. Often those who rise to positions of power in government have little talent, and few ethics, but have an abundance of ambition and narcissistic need to control others. These are the kinds of people all of us need protection from.
One word: Ukraine
Exactly!!
For a start!
The narrative from the Ukraine negates any and all of Biden and the Democrat’s rhetoric concerning weapons.
A total wasted effort.
There were 58 shootings at schools during the previous “assault weapons ban.”
They only want to ban them again to further their effort at forcing law-abiding citizens to surrender all self protection.
Biden: “If you need 20 bullets to kill a deer, you suck at hunting.”
Us: “If you need to ban normal capacity magazines to govern, you suck at governing.”
Hey Joe. Is your definition of an assault weapon any semiautomic firearm? I’ll bet it is.
Take your meds and go to bed Gramps.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.