Posted on 04/06/2022 1:15:40 PM PDT by RandFan
The fact that there are 40 candidates running may be one explanation. That and she’s late out of the gate.
Just run Sarah 🏃♀️
50 candidates.
That almost represent every known gender in this galaxy.
Don’t underestimate Sarah Barracuda. This opinion piece is propaganda from Palin-hating CNN which is hardly objective.
But she’s also very well known.
Everyone else, not so much.
That…and a lot of people are tired of her.
Politics seems to be a lot like Hollywood. There are no new ideas or themes. They just dig up something who was popular 15 years ago and they remake it.
Time for her to go back to reality TV.
It is more likely than not that a Republican will take the seat...But Dems can vote Republican and really rig this to make sure she loses.
Leave it to CNN to write a negative story about Palin.
We can never know all the genders, as new genders are being created exponentially.
Remember when they hired an "author" to rent the house next to hers, harass her family, and take photos of her 24/7 for 6 months in the name of writing about the 2008 election?
Nobody knows her, so, out of 40 candidates, she’ll be lucky to get more than 10 votes in the jungle-primary.
All of the other candidates are better known than Palin, and unknown quantity, so, she’s got her work cut out for her.
Being a dark-horse, with no political history whatsoever and no history of running anything, will do her in.
;)
CNN has always hated her guts. They love the Biden gang and Hillary. Nuff said.
> 50 candidates. That almost represent every known gender in this galaxy. <
Just for kicks I looked it up. There are evidently 78 gender pronouns (not kidding). So we need at least 28 more people to enter the race. I hope there’s still time for them to file!
https://psichologyanswers.com/library/lecture/read/115782-what-are-the-78-gender-pronouns
Jungle primary? Isn’t this what California has? Look at the condition of that state. Why did the residents of Alaska vote for this?
LOL
Why in God’s name did Alaska jump on the California election scheme? I can understand why California does it, because you wind up with two Democrats in November and one of them can take a dive thus saving the party a lot of campaign money.
Is Alaska “red” enough to wind up with two Republicans in the November election?
Anytime a leftist references a man or a women..they should have to rattle off all 78 supposed genders.
We didn’t vote for this in CA. it was hoisted upon us, probably the same in Alaska, the legislator in Alaska CAN change this BEFORE they too are under one party rule!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.