[Steve_Seattle]

In other words, all of our rights come from the state, and can be revoked at the state’s convenience.

[rellic]

I have long held the position that Democrats aren’t Americans. These modern Democrats have me questioning as to whether they are human.

[joshua c]

why would a marxist believe in natural rights?

[Flick Lives]

Translation, you have no God-given rights.

[lee martell]

So, she’s either an Atheist or at very least an Agnostic.

[jimtorr]

With the lack of commitment to our nations founding documents, Brown does not belong on the bench at all, much less in the USSC.

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

The more this one opens her mouth, the worse the picture becomes. What are people then, just blobs of protoplasm, or worms?

[Chgogal]

Madame, you/the Swamp are not God.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Disqualifying answer.

[rigelkentaurus]

Yet another lie. She does have a view, the marxist one.

[Dead Corpse]

...principle of limited government...

Was this an attempt at humor? We haven't had truly "limited" government since before LBJ...

[jimwatx]

Whoa that right there should be more than enough to disqualify her.

[SMARTY]

Why NOT??

Aren’t natural rights what her crowd has been screaming about for 80 years??

[Sacajaweau]

Does she even have to be told that her answer does not agree with the views of our forefathers and ALL subsequent generations.

She is really dumb...

[joethedrummer]

This person does NOT understand our Constitution and therefore should NEVER be allowed to sit on a court bench.

[ThunderSleeps]

If her statement doesn’t scare the {excrement} out of you, then you are part of the problem. She is obviously all about big-government, fascist-control, and the state owns you. {shudder} She is the embodiment of 1984.

[ChildOfThe60s]

Silly peasants. Only your rulers have natural rights.

[Deo volente]

Whatever happened to the Declaration of Independence?? “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights...”

I guess Ms. Jackson missed 7th grade Civics class the day that was discussed.

She’s supremely (pun intended) unqualified for the Court, or any judicial position for that matter. The tragedy is she’ll be on SCOTUS for the next 35 years making marxist social and political policy for the rest of us.

[libh8er]

Does this woman even know what a natural right is ?

[Scrambler Bob]

she does not, quote, “hold a position on whether individuals possess natural rights.”
= = =

So, if she were to be voted down, that will be OK?

No recourse, no appeal, no argument?