Translation, you have no God-given rights.
Makes sense when you realize the dem party believes there is no God. Other than soros, that is.
The Constitutional jurisprudence of the U.S. Supreme Court seems to suggest that that court holds the same position, i.e., that it holds no position on tge existence ir binding effect on the natural law that flows from God. In effect, the Supreme Court is ignoring God and the natural law. Moreover, based on an unbroken string if majority opinions going back decades, at least, the Supreme Court seems to be of the mind that nobody has provided a persuasive argument to suggest that it has been in any way wrong to conduct itself in this manner.
Among other omissions, the U.S. Constitution foregoes any mention or suggestion of the Social Kingship of Christ. This has left open for debate the question of whether the mind and will of God must be considered when deciding constitutional questions. Recent trends seem to indicate that this question has already been decided, albeit probably by default, in the negative.
Hence the nominee’s straight-faced non-response response. If she hasn’t accurately reflected the majority SCOTUS position, I’d like to know how the latter fiverges from the substance of her response to Senator Cruz.