Skip to comments.
Sen. Whitehouse: 'I Think It's Pretty Clear That Judge Jackson is a Woman'
cnsnews.com ^
| 3/28/2022 1103hrs edt
| Emily Robertson
Posted on 03/28/2022 12:24:51 PM PDT by rktman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Have you done an exam sheldon? What about lia thomas, world 'ass' swimming championette with a rudder and no udder? Are "they" a real womxn too. After your comments there shel, it's pretty clear you're a fookin' idjit.
1
posted on
03/28/2022 12:24:51 PM PDT
by
rktman
To: rktman
I KNOW a biologist when I see one, Sheldon.
And you, sir, are NO biologist!!!!
2
posted on
03/28/2022 12:27:07 PM PDT
by
lgjhn23
(Pray for America....)
To: rktman
But she has no idea how to define it?
Ridiculous.
3
posted on
03/28/2022 12:28:28 PM PDT
by
Bullish
(This is the most bloated and most inept govt in history.)
To: rktman
NO! Jackson is a LIAR and should not be confirmed based on THAT!
4
posted on
03/28/2022 12:28:35 PM PDT
by
subterfuge
(I'm a pure-blood!)
To: rktman
"Sen. Whitehouse: 'I Think It's Pretty Clear That Judge Jackson is a Woman".Prove it..!
5
posted on
03/28/2022 12:30:25 PM PDT
by
unread
(Everything you ever thought was right, fair and just is completely wrong..... I think..(?))
To: rktman
No ****? There really is a Senator Whitehouse? ROTFL.
6
posted on
03/28/2022 12:31:42 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Don't blame me, I voted for President Trump. Let's Go Brandon! FJB!)
To: rktman
She was very specific...No..."I'm not a biologist".
So she's not talking all the side line sh** gay tranny, lesbo...whatever...
We're talking XX or XY.
7
posted on
03/28/2022 12:32:32 PM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
( )
Doesn’t matter what you think.
She doesn’t know it.
8
posted on
03/28/2022 12:32:34 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(I pledge allegiance to the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands.)
To: rktman
I think it’s pretty clear that Judge Jackson is a woman In today's climate that is an incredibly ignorant and sexist statement.
9
posted on
03/28/2022 12:32:38 PM PDT
by
Fury
To: rktman
No like all dems they are mentally deranged and gender confused:-)
10
posted on
03/28/2022 12:33:01 PM PDT
by
Harpotoo
(Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
To: rktman
Did they just assumed their gender? Bigot!
11
posted on
03/28/2022 12:33:13 PM PDT
by
eclectic
(Liberalism is a mental disorder)
To: rktman
The senator responded: “I think it’s pretty clear that Judge Jackson is a woman. So, I don’t think she has any doubt as to what a woman is. The question was asked in the context of dealing with the law about transgender individuals.” Actually, that was not the context. It came during a discussion about Ruth Ginsburg's opinion in US vs. Virginia, which was about what we would now consider traditional male and female discrimination.
I think they oddest thing about the whole questioning at this point, was not the Jackson didn't know what a woman was, (which was pretty bizarre), but that she was completely unaware of this case, which was one of feminist icon Ginsburg's biggest cases. When Barrett was being confirmed, she knew Ginsburg's record backward and forward. Of course, she was replacing Ginsburg. Still, coming in as a heralded black woman, she should have been very familiar with Ginsburg's cases, as well as Thomas' and even Thurgood Marshall's. This tells me she did no prep to speak of, and has relied entirely on her demographics to carry he through the process.
To: rktman
How can we be so sure what “gender” she is?
Do lizard people have to be of their same birth gender when pretending to be humans?
13
posted on
03/28/2022 12:35:38 PM PDT
by
Grimmy
(equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
To: rktman
Judge Jackson was dodging a discussion that would have gotten her in trouble with Democrat wokesters. In their ideology, defining a woman is verboten because it would eventually come down to basic 1st grade biology.
That makes her a partisan ideologue. Good trap set and sprung.
14
posted on
03/28/2022 12:35:38 PM PDT
by
pgyanke
(Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
To: rktman
Sure, today she’s a black woman.
But tomorrow she could be an Eskimo man.
15
posted on
03/28/2022 12:38:32 PM PDT
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money)
To: rktman
No, I’m afraid that it isn’t clear. Jackson doesn’t know what a woman is, by her own declaration.
16
posted on
03/28/2022 12:39:36 PM PDT
by
Seruzawa
("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
To: rktman
How would Senator Whitehouse know? Is he a biologist?
17
posted on
03/28/2022 12:41:04 PM PDT
by
Little Ray
(Civilization runs on a narrow margin. What sustains it is not magic, but hard work. )
To: subterfuge
This. your comment is all that is needed to highlight her lack of being qualified. If she is going to lie under oath then she has perjured herself and has no business on any bench, much less SCOTUS.
18
posted on
03/28/2022 12:41:34 PM PDT
by
NicoDon
To: rktman
Have the Republicans put forth a motion to Censure him for this vile hate speech??
19
posted on
03/28/2022 12:42:21 PM PDT
by
eyeamok
(founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
To: FlingWingFlyer
[[There really is a Senator Whitehouse? ROTFL.]]
yep- he is senator presidential retreat’s cousin i believe
20
posted on
03/28/2022 12:48:38 PM PDT
by
Bob434
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson