To: ChicagoConservative27; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy; campaignPete R-CT; ...
Cameras should be in the Supreme Court. If this leads to wise Latina preening for her audience, so be it. The people have the right to see the sausage made.
9 posted on
03/23/2022 6:44:08 PM PDT by
Impy
("We didn't steal the election, we swear!!!" - Sincerely, The Election Thieves )
To: Impy
Exactly. The dems don’t want the public to see how deficient their candidates are.
18 posted on
03/23/2022 6:50:30 PM PDT by
telescope115
(Proud member of the ANTIFAuci movement. )
To: Impy
No! They definitely should not. A camera doesnt make anything more transparent. We need to stoptreating our courts like they’re a form of entertainment 🙄
To: Impy
I remember when Sasse was the "Tea Party candidate" and had Mark Levin, Sarah Palin, the Club for Growth, RedState.com, Senate Conservatives Fund, etc., etc., all touting him in the GOP primary.
I betsa they wish they had gone with Shane Osborn now.
42 posted on
03/23/2022 8:01:02 PM PDT by
BillyBoy
(Build Biden Better.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson