Skip to comments.
Editorial: Spies who lie: 51 ‘intelligence’ experts refuse to apologize for discrediting true Hunter Biden story
The NY Post ^
| March 18, 2022
| By Post Editorial Board
Posted on 03/19/2022 8:25:55 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
To: Rappini
I Pray that when DJT is 47 that he pulls all the intelligence passes for all 51 of these aholes for knot acknowledging the truth about the Hunters lap top.How about the FBICIADHSDNI folks who spied on candidate and then president DJT. Jail or gallows? I opt for the latter. Hell actually I will volunteer to trip the trap door latch.
21
posted on
03/19/2022 9:45:24 AM PDT
by
eeriegeno
(Checks and balances??? What checks and balances?)
To: FreedomPoster; Sarcazmo
Good article; thanks for the link.
22
posted on
03/19/2022 10:01:03 AM PDT
by
Carriage Hill
(A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Why would they apologize..they said what they said on purpose knowing it would hurt Trump who they despise more than anything in the whole wide world..They knew Hunter’s laptop was real, full of videos of him raping children and having sex with prostitutes, they knew, heck I bet most of those same agents have done it themselves..so gotta protect their own
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Clapper lied directly to Congress and was not held to account. ANY document that man signs is false - count on it.
24
posted on
03/19/2022 10:11:28 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: Oldeconomybuyer
CIA spies lying to America on behalf of the deep state, it’s what they do, why apologize.
25
posted on
03/19/2022 10:18:24 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I must congratulate the N.Y. Post on a superb job of reporting. Based on the published article they attempted to contact ever single signee of the original phony petition. They rarely succeeded but we have the scum bags to thank for that.
When I was a kid we called this “reporting”. In spades in this case.
26
posted on
03/19/2022 10:25:31 AM PDT
by
InterceptPoint
(Ted, you finally endorsed.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Id advise them to not waste their nor our time - their apology wouldn’t be accepted. Just make a list and remind us who they are every now and then.
Especially when they resurface as paid ‘experts’ on TV.
27
posted on
03/19/2022 10:43:03 AM PDT
by
skeeter
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The answer is to Criminally Charge and Prosecute every one of them for making an ILLEGAL In Kind Political Contribution, which is a FELONY
28
posted on
03/19/2022 10:59:17 AM PDT
by
eyeamok
(founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
If these are government intelligent sources, the case could be made that they have violated the Hatch Act.
29
posted on
03/19/2022 11:02:54 AM PDT
by
aimhigh
(THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Our “intelligence services” are totally corrupt, the Congress is totally corrupt, the DOJ is totally corrupt, the vipers controlling the WH are totally corrupt.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Being exposed doesn’t matter. Only one thing matters.
32
posted on
03/19/2022 11:23:41 AM PDT
by
Born in 1950
(Anti left, nothing else.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Chuck Schumer in 2017: "Our intelligence agencies have six ways from Sunday to get back at their critics."
Said with an approving smirk, this comment by the leading Senate Democrat (1) signaled his approval of Deep State criminality and (2) telegraphed his confidence that the Deep State would always be on his side.
We saw evidence of this before, during, and after the 2016 election, and it continues to this day. One of the most flagrant examples of this was the false statement - issued just before the election and signed by dozens of high-ranking intelligence officials - claiming that the Hunter Biden laptop story was "Russian disinformation." Not only was this statement used as a justification for the MSM and Big Tech to censor the story, but it switched the focus and culpability onto the Trump campaign and conservative media, who were portrayed as Russian dupes, liars, even co-conspirators. A story damaging to Biden was thus flipped and used to damage Trump.
Setting aside the issue of election fraud, this single story may have been sufficient to give Biden his narrow margin of victory. Seventeen months later, the Ukraine is in shambles and we are on the verge of war with Russia, two developments that would have been very unlikely had Trump remained in office. Corrupt intelligence agencies are not only a threat to our freedoms, but they can be deadly, as we are now seeing.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
In Washington DC, loyalty to the country Party is all that matters.
34
posted on
03/19/2022 11:39:40 AM PDT
by
Bratch
To: TornadoAlley3
Keep the list for future reference.😎
35
posted on
03/19/2022 11:43:49 AM PDT
by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Look at the whores who did respond. Their acknowledgment of their complete lack of probity -- and Hepburn practically
brags about his own ignorance -- means the deep state needs removal. Now.
- Don Hepburn, former national security executive, now president of Boanerges Solutions LLC: “My position has not changed any. I believe the Russians made a huge effort to alter the course of the election . . . The Russians are masters of blending truth and fiction and making something feel incredibly real when it’s not. Nothing I have seen really changes my opinion. I can’t tell you what part is real and what part is fake, but the thesis still stands for me, that it was a media influence hit job.”
- Jonna Hiestand Mendez, former CIA technical operations officer, now on board of the International Spy Museum: “I don’t have any comment. I would need a little more information.”
- Emile Nakhleh, former director of CIA’s Political Islam Strategic Analysis Program, now at University of New Mexico: “I have not seen any information since then that would alter the decision behind signing the letter. That’s all I can go into. The whole issue was highly politicized and I don’t want to deal with that. I still stand by that letter.”
- Greg Treverton, former National Intelligence Council chair, now senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies: “I’ll pass. I haven’t followed the case recently.”
36
posted on
03/19/2022 11:44:59 AM PDT
by
StAnDeliver
(Each of you have at least 1 of these in your 401k: Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, J&J, Merck and GSK)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"The Post reached out to those who signed the letter. Most would answer the question.""
Do they mean that most WOULDN'T answer the question?
To: Steve_Seattle
""The Post reached out to those who signed the letter. Most would answer the question. Do they mean that most WOULDN'T answer the question?" 43-7 "no response" or "no comment". A few of those 7 amount to "no comment".
38
posted on
03/19/2022 12:38:52 PM PDT
by
StAnDeliver
(Each of you have at least 1 of these in your 401k: Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, J&J, Merck and GSK)
To: StAnDeliver
To: Oldeconomybuyer
In the Roman days everyone one of these would be rounded up and done- you know what to- once a new regime came to power. Voting for the same old same old (D v R) isn’t working anymore.....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson