Posted on 03/14/2022 7:16:54 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
On Sunday morning, Brent Renaud, an American filmmaker and journalist who had previously been with The New York Times, was tragically killed while reporting on the refugee crisis arising from the Russia-Ukraine war.
Follow Jordan on Substack.
It was reported in the corporate press, in almost unanimous fashion, that Russia was responsible for his passing, even though no evidence had emerged to confirm this claim, which was disseminated by Ukrainian officers at the crime scene.
US film-maker Brent Renaud killed by Russian forces in Ukraine https://t.co/qr14kfd2S0
— Guardian US (@GuardianUS) March 13, 2022
New York Times reporter gunned down by Russian troops https://t.co/oQ0v8lQRag
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) March 13, 2022
In a moment’s notice, powerful world leaders and individuals routinely condemned Russia for the tragic death of the American citizen. U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson and State Department Spokesman Ned Price were two of many to show their contempt for Moscow’s alleged act.
Putin’s barbaric actions murdering Brent Renaud and other innocent civilians are testing not just Ukraine but all of humanity.
Speaking to President @ZelenskyyUa I assured him that we will continue to do all that we can to bring an end to this disastrous conflict.
— Boris Johnson (@BorisJohnson) March 13, 2022
We are horrified that journalists and filmmakers—noncombatants—have been killed and injured in Ukraine by Kremlin forces. We extend condolences to all those affected by this horrific violence. This is yet another gruesome example of the Kremlin’s indiscriminate actions.
— Ned Price (@StateDeptSpox) March 13, 2022
There’s just one big problem with that narrative.
All of the available evidence we have points to the Ukrainians, not the Russians, being responsible for the tragic shooting of Renaud.
This morning, Renaud and his crew, who had been contracted with Time Magazine, were traveling through the outskirts of Kiev, Ukraine’s capital city, and on their way to document the plight of the refugee situation.
Follow Jordan on Substack.
According to the Ukrainian soldiers on the scene, Renaud’s vehicle came under fire from Russian forces, resulting in his death. After Renaud was killed, Ukrainian police and public affairs officials took videos and photos of Renaud’s still warm body, and posted the display on the internet for the world to see.
Renaud’s body was put on display, they said, to showcase the indiscriminate brutality of the Russians.
Andrey Nebitov, the leader of the National Police for the Kiev region, was one of the first, if not the first Ukrainian official to accuse Russian troops of killing Renaud. Several other Ukrainian officials then echoed Nebitov’s claims, describing the Russians as responsible.
Head of the Kyiv Police Department says that Russian troops opened fire on a car with foreign journalists in and shot dead 51-year-old New York Times videojournalist Brent Renaud in Irpin. One of his colleagues is injured and is in hospital. #Ukraine
— Nick Stylianou (@nmsonline) March 13, 2022
But since the initial Ukrainian PR campaign, compelling evidence, in addition to multiple eyewitness testimony, has emerged to tell a very different story of the day’s events.
Shortly after the incident occurred, a video was posted to social media, with Renaud’s body on display in the background. In the video (CONTENT WARNING), a Ukrainian soldier says the shooting occurred in the settlement of Romanovka.
Ukrainian man in the video says the US journalist was killed during the shelling in the area of Romanovka, which is located behind Irpen, which is controlled by Ukraine. pic.twitter.com/OEhY0RAdka
— EL ZAR Del Ejido 4T (@RanchoSovietico) March 13, 2022
The location of the incident is very significant, because it established that the shooting took place well within a swath of territory that remains within the lines controlled by Ukrainian forces. Now, it’s certainly possible that troop movements shifted in those early hours, but there is no documented evidence of Russian troops being anywhere near the crime scene, before during, or after the incident.
The Russians have in recent days repeatedly shelled the entire area, but Renaud was killed by nearby gunfire.
#Russian forces again conducted few ground offensives on March 13, only securing new terrain in #Donetsk and #Luhansk Oblasts. Read the latest report form @TheStudyofWar and @criticalthreats: https://t.co/4zyuaBh0Gn pic.twitter.com/awpmGifloH
— ISW (@TheStudyofWar) March 13, 2022
distance between the area of shooting those US reporters is 2km – and the Americans were even behind a slope – so it is rather impossible for Russians doing that. pic.twitter.com/5qXgB46gXW
— — GEROMAN — 👀 – (@GeromanAT) March 13, 2022
Another major piece of information came out earlier this evening, when The New York Times confirmed that the incident occurred at a Ukrainian checkpoint.
Incredible journalist, brave soul, wonderful human. It was a privilege to work with Brent at the NYT, where he & his brother Craig contributed over a decade of powerful documentary journalism, telling compelling stories about often ignored people & places https://t.co/N2vkvRrfzV
— Ann Derry (@annderry) March 13, 2022
“Capt. Oleksandr Bogai, the deputy chief of police in Irpin, said Mr. Renaud was shot in the head when Russian forces fired at his car, which was being driven by a local civilian across a Ukrainian checkpoint near the northern border of Irpin.”
This again establishes that Renaud had been moving through Ukrainian, not Russian checkpoints.
Now, here’s where the most important piece of testimony comes into play.
Our most important eyewitness is Juan Arrendondo, Renaud’s colleague, who was physically in the vehicle with him at the time they came under fire. Arrendondo was interviewed earlier in the day from a Ukrainian hospital, where he discussed what happened at the scene of the chaotic incident.
I’ve highlighted the significant portions of the brief interview, but feel free to watch it yourself below.
“We crossed the checkpoint and they started shooting at us,” Arrendondo started. “So the driver turned around, and they kept shooting at us … I saw him being shot in the neck, and we got split, and I got pulled into the … ambulance, I don’t know.”
Colleague of US filmmaker & journalist Brent Renaud narrates the ordeal. Brent died in the outskirts of Kiev. Video posted by Member of Ukraine's Parliament Inna Sovsun. pic.twitter.com/tNDPkmiGyY
— Sidhant Sibal (@sidhant) March 13, 2022
This is a critical piece of information because it rules out the possibility that Renaud died from possible Russian shelling or a Russian sniper of some sort. Arrendondo, who is by far our most reliable source for this incident, makes it clear that the shooting came from the direction of the checkpoint. And The New York Times, backed by other sources, have established the area as a Ukrainian checkpoint. And in addition to that, the most recent maps of troop positions show the scene of the crime as an area that remains controlled by Ukrainian forces.
In all likelihood, Brent Renaud was killed by Ukrainian forces. And instead of taking responsibility for the tragic shooting, the Ukrainians used Renaud’s death as an instrument to advance a propaganda campaign against their enemy.
Rest In Peace, Brent Renaud.
I would suggest sending all the “journalists” we can round up to Ukraine.
There is an interview of his partner on Telegram since immediately after the incident. He clearly said that they were shot on the Ukrainian checkpoint for taking pictures.
Don’t wanna sound callous however people in this line of work know the dangers.....this man’s death is no more or less important than any other.
No he did not. Russians did the deed.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin/31927
If you have access to Telegram, here is the interview of his cameraman “Wayne” who was admitted to the hospital in Kiev after the shooting.
The real story is censored by Western sources for some reason.
The reporter was not alone. His partner was also shot and there is video of him being treated for gunshot wounds. As he is on the table being treated he tells the story of what happened. How they were passing thru one Ukrainian checkpoint and, as they approached the next one, they both were shot.
What will tell the tale is whether there is continued outrage and threats of retaliation from the West. If not, we’ll know he was shot by Ukrainians.
Thanks
“... the Ukrainians used Renaud’s death as an instrument to advance a propaganda campaign against their enemy.”
“After Renaud was killed, Ukrainian police and public affairs officials took videos and photos of Renaud’s still warm body, and posted the display on the internet for the world to see.”
Yea, I’d say they used him as propaganda. I don’t understand why so many want to believe the Ukraine military is so noble.
They can be just as evil and ruthless as the Russians can be.
There’s more to that video tho. That video was cut off before He says the Ukranian military shot him.
From the above fragment it is clear who did it. There are obviously no Russians between Romanovka and Irpen.
Every source has the Russian shooting at them when they crossed past the Ukrainian checkpoint.
This interpretation is incorrect and provides no evidence that Ukrainians shot him.
The lies and the propaganda in this war have been non stop.
The Azov battalions have used citizens of Donbass region as human shields. The Azov battalions have bombed their own people claiming it was Russia. Checkpoints in Marioupol manned by Ukrainian fighters and Azov Neo Nazis opened fire and shot to death people trying to flee that region. The missile that killed 20 people near Lviv was shot by Ukrainian forces towards Russian positions but fell short killing Ukrainian civilians including children. The media is saying Russia has done all these things when it’s they who have tried to be careful and limit civilian casualties. Putin could have carpet bombed Kiev but has not. He has put the pressure on Zelinsky to convince him that it’s time to surrender for the sake of his people. Ukrainian false flags, although parroted in the MSM have not had their desired effect. The Ukrainians were unable to cause a nuclear incident due to the Russian forces encircling and protecting those facilities. The Bio lab threats seem to have been calmed by the spotlight being put on those facilities and the Ukrainians are running out of options to project a false flag of major proportions to blame on Russia in order to force Nato’s direct involvement. Nato knows Putin will bomb those resupply caravans of weapons coming in from other countries to bolster Ukrainian forces. The western media is loosing its information war as Russia and Ukrainian officials meet with Israel and France who are trying to broker a ceasefire. This thing whole thing is winding down. Watch how quickly the MSM pivots back into Covid.
But heh, the Ukrainians must have done it.
The pro-Russian spin coming out of certain sectors of the conservative media is lunatic.
True.
Not sure if anyone has seen this 2016 UN humanitarian report regarding the ‘Russian’ Ukrainians. They’ve been thru hell and atrocities.
https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/UA/Ukraine_14th_HRMMU_Report.pdf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.