When an urban central has been shelled for a period of time, buildings do get damaged. But they typically do not get covered in tree branches. I’ve seen plenty of pictures of places like Stalingrad. A wasteland of bombed out structures. No tree branches. Why is the best route to the hospital through a dense mass of dead tree branches? It’s ridiculous propaganda.
We can call this retarded nonsense the "no tree branches in bombed cities" conspiracy theory.
Write up a blog about it with your photos from Stalingrad showing no vegetation or tree branches everywhere.
Just don't use this one, all this magic wood survived in it somehow despite your deeply scientific and common sense conclusion that all wood just disintegrates if a bomb blows up any building in a city:
It’s strange there is not one bit of debris from the interior of these hospital rooms. No sheets, tables mattresses. That stuff seems like it would be everywhere. The rooms are empty shells.