Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thegagline

Why does it need to be the U.S.?
Why can’t Poland use another NATO and/or EU partner as a proxy? Or, better yet, provide them directly?


37 posted on 03/10/2022 2:47:29 PM PST by throwthebumsout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: throwthebumsout

Because IIRC as part of the NATO charter, sending those aircraft directly to a warring party outside of NATO without the consent of the rest of NATO means that if they are attacked the rest of NATO does *not* have to come help.

Or put another way - if Poland had provided aircraft to the Ukranians directly as Blinken had been saying he wanted them to and Russia struck back, Poland could not expect the rest of NATO to help them. They were understandably uninterested.

More specifically, do you really think our current administration would have gone to defend Poland if there were Russian reprisal strikes? Or would they have suddenly ‘discovered’ the clause and ‘regretfully’ told Poland they were on their own?


81 posted on 03/10/2022 4:32:41 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson