Obviously, the DNA services that test your DNA to identify your heritage are closely aligned with government agencies as there are numerous stories of the DNA sent to these services being used to prosecute criminals or find criminal relatives of people who send samples.
Also, this was promoted by concerns from our favorite DA Chesa Boudin and our other favorite pervert, Weiner.
What if the victim of sexual assault is found to be a mass murderer or something heinous? Are courts bound to ignore this evidence?
Again, not a fan of databases but I don’t think these people are thinking two steps ahead.
The mass collection of individual data by government and corporations is criminal and despotic. Full stop.
So if a “victim” of rape has their DNA put into the criminal database, and later that same DNA matches that obtained from a homicide crime scene, then the “victim” can’t be charged based on the DNA evidence?
Why?
Dhimmicraps have always been soft on crime. Now they’re actively pro-crime.
Collection and retention issues are a separate issue. Prior SA should NOT be a free pass for your own crimes.
claim to be raped (and be a woman) and then become immune to prosecution for mass murder!
IOW, it actually protects the ASSAULTERS!.......................
California State Sen. Scott Wiener is a different person than former NY 9th District Congressman Anthony Weiner. Huma Abedin’s husband is the best-known pervert of the two.
But the California Wiener is also a major pervert. Not only is he a democrat (automatically a pervert, it seems), but he is a leader in San Francisco’s LGBT community; he co-chaired the Alice B. Toklas LGBT Democratic Club; co-chaired BALIF (the Bay Area’s LGBT bar association); and co-chaired the LGBT Community Center.
So they are BOTH major Demo perverts, one straight, one homo.
This is the same guy who decriminalized intentionally infecting people with AIDS btw. As outrageous as it is its kinda understandable being california but at the same time it gets weird again when you realize so much of this is coming from one guy.
Any non-felon should mhave the right to delete their DNA data from any company or government agency.
Period.
Same with facial recognition and voice prints.
Science and technology. They make our lives so much easier.
Good for excluding but not including?
Yeah...no. Not seeing the logic in that.
Good for excluding but not including?
Yeah...no. Not seeing the logic in that.
Charlie Chaplin could have avoided charges of paternity if DNA testing was allowed.
Blood test proved it wasn’t his child but they convicted him anyway.
The CA courts drove him out of the USA he loved.