U.S. Military Vaccine Mandates Only Cover "FDA-Approved" Jabs Which Are NOT Available

America First Report ^ | 20 FEB 2022 | J.D. Rucker

[E. Pluribus Unum]

The "bait and switch" that the United States military is currently perpetrating against servicemembers is despicable. We need to question why it's happening, and what it really means.

Members of the United States military who have been or will be vaccinated against Covid-19 as a result of the mandates are NOT following the direct orders of Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin. Those who CHOOSE to be vaccinated are in compliance, but so too are those who CHOOSE not be jabbed based on the orders given on August 24, 2021.

According to the memo [emphasis mine]:

Mandatory vaccination against COVID-19 will only use COVID-19 vaccines that receive full licensure from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in accordance with FDA-approved labeling and guidance. Service members voluntarily immunized with a COVID-19 vaccine under FDA Emergency Use Authorization or World Health Organization Emergency Use Listing in accordance with applicable dose requirements prior to, or after, the establishment of this policy are considered fully vaccinated.

This is not a minor point. The mandates only apply to FDA-approved injections. Currently, the only two injections that have received FDA approval are Comirnaty and Spikevax. These vaccines are NOT being offered in the United States, including to U.S. servicemembers.

A letter posted to The Gateway Pundit by an anonymous 19-year active-duty officer in the U.S. Army details his/her frustration with the "bait and switch":

I am an active-duty Army officer with almost two decades of service.

I have refused to take the Covid-19 “vaccine” that Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin mandated for all military personnel on August 24, 2021, and like thousands of others across the Department of Defense (DOD), I have submitted a request for a religious accommodation (RA) to be exempted from the shot. The Pentagon’s RA provision regarding this shot is proving to be somewhat of a circus and is receiving close attention thanks to multiple ongoing legal challenges. Due to the extreme political impetus behind the Covid vaccine push, I believe the DOD had no intent to approve any of the RA requests; in fact, I would not be surprised if instructions for blanket denials weren’t just unique to the Navy, as Liz Wheeler exposed several months ago.

However, an equally large concern is the bait-and-switch the DOD is (successfully thus far) executing regarding the non-availability of the mandated, FDA-approved shots. The FDA has approved Pfizer’s Comirnaty and Moderna’s SpikeVax, neither of which is currently available in the US, according to the CDC and the manufacturers. The FDA has repeatedly affirmed in its letters of authorization to Pfizer extending its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) that the Pfizer Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines are “legally distinct with certain differences…”. A US District Court Judge in Florida recognized the same thing in November. In his denial of the plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction in John Doe #1-#14 and Jane Doe #1-#2 v. Lloyd Austin, et al., Judge Allen Winsor nevertheless wrote, “I do not discount the FDA’s conclusion that the two vaccines [Pfizer Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 Vaccine] are medically interchangeable. Of course, that does not mean that the two vaccines are legally indistinguishable – the FDA concedes they are not.” Additionally, the CDC’s website lists Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech separately and notes that Pfizer has no plans to distribute Comirnaty in the US at this time (as of 9 February). The document indicates the same for Moderna regarding their recently approved SpikeVax shot. The actual FDA-approved shots are not currently available in the US.

Excerpt. Read more at https://jdrucker.substack.com/p/us-military-vaccine-mandates-only?utm_source=url

[sten]

it’s critical to hold them to the proper definition of ‘vaccine’ established in the 1800s

these shots are gene therapy and provide no immunity, therefore cannot be vaccines... immunity being the main point of a vaccine

as a bonus, these jabs are not approved by the FDA as they keep failing the animal trials (by ‘failing’ i mean they kill all the animals)

therefore, the proper name for these jabs is: experimental gene therapy

which no one would line up for

[zipper]

Once a military member has been injured (or worse) there is no recourse. They can’t sue the government, their commanders, Big Pharma, or anyone else after being bullied and coerced into taking the experimental gene therapies.

It’s worse than what they endured under experiments involving Agent Orange, the LSD experiments, Gulf War Syndrome, and the Anthrax vaccine, combined.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Anarchy is a two-way street.

Once the system is overwhelmed, retributions can be extracted and no controlling legal authority will be there to punish the extractors.

[Sequoyah101]

Try this argument in the military and see where it gets you.

It is right but they don’t GAF.

[zipper]

It looks like Canada is approaching that disposition, even more rapidly than we are.

But they are weaker, less able to resist, because they gave up their ability to resist when they allowed the government to seize their firearms.

[Delta 21]

No one in the US has been given the approved jab as its not out yet. All the lemmings think that because the FDA approved it that magically all the stock on the shelf is approved? It’s not the same thing, it doesn’t work that way and they know it.

[GailA]

btt