Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court to weigh in on asylum-seekers made to wait in Mexico
The Associated Press ^ | February 18, 2022 | By MARK SHERMAN

Posted on 02/18/2022 12:59:07 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is giving the Biden administration a quick hearing on its effort to scrap a Trump-era border policy that makes asylum-seekers wait in Mexico for hearings in U.S. immigration court.

The justices agreed Friday to hear the administration’s appeal of lower court rulings that forced it to reinstate the “Remain in Mexico” policy that former President Donald Trump introduced in 2019. Arguments will take place in April, with a decision expected by late June.

President Joe Biden suspended the program, formally called Migrant Protection Protocols, on his first day in office and Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas ended it in June 2021.

But after the Republican-led states of Missouri and Texas sued over Biden’s action, a federal judge ordered the policy put back in place, and a three-judge appeals court panel agreed. The district judge and two of the three appellate judges are Trump appointees.

Mayorkas has acknowledged that the “Remain in Mexico” policy likely contributed to a drop in illegal border crossings in 2019, but said the reduction came with “substantial and unjustifiable human costs” to asylum-seekers who were exposed to violence while waiting in Mexico.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; asylum; biden; border; brandon; illegalaliens; mexico; remaininmexico; scotus; tds; xiden

1 posted on 02/18/2022 12:59:07 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Let them have “asylum” in Mexico!


2 posted on 02/18/2022 1:00:27 PM PST by BenLurkin ((The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

This nonsense has to stop!
BAMN!


3 posted on 02/18/2022 1:24:16 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another Sam Adams now that we desperately need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Let them stay at the judge’s house and on his dime.


4 posted on 02/18/2022 1:25:25 PM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

This already went through the courts. What are they trying to pull now?


5 posted on 02/18/2022 1:39:33 PM PST by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I thought the “remain in Mexico” plan had already been tested in court and judged to be OK.


6 posted on 02/18/2022 1:50:02 PM PST by elpadre (And here in NCini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Heck it doesn/t matter what the Supreme Court rules. Biden will just ignore any ruling that goes against him.


7 posted on 02/18/2022 2:11:52 PM PST by antidemoncrat (somRead more at: https://economicti Astronomers see white dwarf 'switch on and off' for first time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

Go to court until you find a judge who gives you the answer you want. They’re spending our tax dollars so it makes no difference to them.


8 posted on 02/18/2022 2:14:12 PM PST by abbastanza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson