Posted on 02/15/2022 6:43:20 PM PST by palmer
If you were to watch CNN, the former cable news network’s biggest story about Hillary Clinton is that she’s selling a $32 baseball cap with “But Her Emails Hat” stitched on it pink as a “dad hat”....
...
The big Hillary revelation doesn’t involve the $32 baseball cap that CNN is promoting, but a digital Clinton spy network that allegedly targeted Trump Tower and even the White House.
In the fall of 2016, as the election was approaching and the investigation into her own server was heating up. Hillary Clinton threw out the bizarre claim that "computer scientists" had "uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank."
...
DNS services, much like NPAC, served as a kind of organizing principle, as a map of internet traffic. The tech company in question, anonymous in the filings, was allegedly providing DNS resolution services to the White House Executive Office.
That allowed it to spy on White House traffic.
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
The point is that such spying and resale is not illegal, but how the Hillary campaigns stooges obtained that particular information might have been illegal, and spying is spying regardless. But spying is not "infiltrating" because the company in question is not alleged to have hacked into WH computers.
But there's more and Bongino hinted at it in his show. The DNS information was not the only information that was obtained in this operation according to the Durham filing. Back in 2016 it could be that someone in the WH using an old brewer could be connected to a malicious server by the DNS provider, in a very targeted attack. The malicious server could have performed SSL stripping or some other man-in-the-middle attack to masquerade as the server that. the WH victim was intending to access. Then the spying is on the content itself. Or could even alter content.
Those attacks don't happen nowadays without the browser spitting out annoying warnings and in many cases refusing to connect at all. But in my limited recollection, that could have happened in 2017 during the Trump presidency. It is speculation however.
Should’a, could’a, would’a.
Hundreds of FBI files plus whatever she liberated as Secretary of State says this all goes away.
I’m waiting for the ‘my father died in fort marcy park and all I got was this lousy T shirt’ to come out.
Yop, because “Should’a, could’a, would’a.” is all we will ever get out of this. Possibly 2-3 other sacrificial lambs, whom will be pardoned once the heat dies down. But the real perpetrators will simply keep on keeping on. High ranking Democrats are above the law in much the same manner the high-ranking nobility was a few hundred years ago.
Sovreign Immunity, I believe it is called.
Bookmark
Well it's gone from the general consensus of, "Nothing will happen to any of them" to now, "2-3 sacrificial lambs. Things seem to be looking up!☺
They do start looking up, just about now. Where the Charlie brown meme with Lucy and the foot ball?
I hope he gets to kick it this time.
Suddenly qualifiers appear along with their predictions.
.
The game isn’t over, you know that, right?
That is the one. Lol
So now we know
1. The O’Vomit admin was spying on Trump for at least a year. (And who knows about the other candidates)
2. The Russia story is a smokescreen serving 4 purposes
A: To Provide an excuse for Hillary’s loss
B: To Provide an excuse for the Spying on Trump, even thought the spying started long before any Russia stuff started.
C: To delegitimize Trump, by claiming he won unfairly.
D. To COVER UP Seth Rich’s Murder
3. We also know that a crime has been committed by the agents of O’Stench in leaking information from their spying.
4. We know the Russians did not affect the election. OLiar’s own Intel Chiefs confirm this.
5. We know according to Wikileaks, Russia was not the source of their information. They claim it was a Bernie supported from the DNC. Although Wikileaks never released Hillary’s emails. (If they have them)
6. Podesta was phished not hacked, and if Russians were involved, it was the Russian Mob, not their intelligence agencies (as much as they are separate entities)
7. The CIA/NSA has the ability to cloak their cyber activities as other hostile nations. This lends credence to the reports that the Hillary emails were sent out by disgruntled NSA types, pissed that Hillary was walking on mishandling classified info charges, while O’Shitstain punished their guys to the max for security violations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.