Posted on 02/15/2022 9:16:55 AM PST by MarvinStinson
Ditto beyond my pay grade. I've been retired from IT for quite awhile so I am not current on current IT practices. That said, I would expect the WH would have it's own DNS servers as part of the infrastructure. Those servers might not have been directly located in the WH. If the DNS servers were directly on the main WH network trunk, anybody with access to that unclassified network could put a packet sniffer on the trunk.
I noticed that Breitbert screwed up the 4th paragraph. It says that Durham responded but it is actually Sussman that responded.
This is above my pay grade, but I thought DNS servers resolved domains to IPs. If it was only intercepting DNS requests, than it would be more like spying on where traffic was being routed, and not necessarily logging any of the actual packet data. No?
If I’m right, that is plenty bad enough as it is. I’m not minimizing. I was just wondering. I think that Spoofing DNS services isn’t necessarily the same thing as a proxy that can log all of the data.
—
Not sure either. It might have been DNS cache snooping, which is basically seeing, as you mentioned, where requests are being directed. Sort of like the postman looking at the address of every letter you send.
Well, he has certainly had enough time to get his ducks in a row.
I really want to believe that Durham is a stand-up guy and is going to get to the truth but I have been so disillusioned by our 2 part justice system that I don’t expect anyone of significance to be held to account. Having said that, if Dunham really is serious then he has to know or strongly suspect that this scandal will implicate some very, very powerful folks, hence the need to build an airtight case. I can understand that.
Time for some more Arkancides. Eh, eh, eh...
LET’S GO SUSSMANN!!
I believe the filing with the court by Duham was to show there was a conflict of interest between Sussmann’s attorneys and the Tech exec #1. Durham is saying the attorneys cannot represent both parties as there is a conflict of interest. Durham wants the attorneys to either represent Sussmann, the tech Exec or withdraw.
The factual portion of the filing was to show the court the nature of the conflict.
While I am concerned about the statute of limitations (5-years, I believe) if this is an ongoing criminal enterprise, the statute can begin at the last overt act, so Durham may still have 3-years or more to bring prosecution.
I bet Marc Elias is starting to look over his shoulder. He’s the key to the whole operation. If they can flip him, she falls.
I’ll believe that when I see it.
I agree. Hillary’s on the outs with the Dems so she’s being thrown to the wolves.
Obama,Brennan, Comey and Clapper. They’re the ones I want to see being hung.
“Obama,Brennan, Comey and Clapper. They’re the ones I want to see being hung.”
And the heavy hitters in the MSM.
Now that the truth is out, can PDJT sure the pants off of the media — sue each one personally and not just their networks?
So will I!
HST, keep the “Big House” narrative alive!
If you can’t do the time don’t do the crime😂. I hope many people go to jail.
Who are his lawyers and from what firm?
I will!
I’m with you. I’m so jaded by watching the powerful and the elites get away with murder and We The People are the joke all of this malfeasance is being committed against us and no one is ever held to account.
A seemingly endless parade of garbage in business suits who skate away into the sunset scot free.
The problem appears to be that those who ARE doing the crime believe that that their “connections” will keep them out of the “Big House.”
So far, it appears to be the case!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.