Posted on 02/15/2022 4:46:18 AM PST by rktman
Large numbers of Republicans and independents have wondered just what was going on during the 2016 election season when Democrats were cooking up and talking about their claims that the campaign of Donald Trump was colluding with Russia.
The evidence just didn't connect for them, and a subsequent years-long investigation by former FBI chief Robert Mueller debunked the allegations.
So the questions have been around ever since – who did what to get that fake news scheme going in the newspapers – and the federal government, and Special Counsel John Durham is reviewing the evidence, already having brought three criminal cases.
But now there's a stunning new development: Just about as many Democrats as Republicans want an investigation into just what that year's Democrat candidate, Hillary Clinton, had to do with the collusion conspiracy theory.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Some of the dems that might get swept up in Durham’s net are trying to stay ahead of the narrative. I.E. - cover their ass.
CC
While democrats hitched their wagons to the rising Clinton star in 1992, I've always felt that deep down, the DC cocktail circuit has always resented having their party run by Arkansas trailer trash. That's why they helped Obama steal the nomination from Hillary in 2008.
“We’ll circle back to that.”
Ewww!
There's an image that will leave lasting damage.
It’s an incredibly small sample of those Dems who say they’re paying attention to it. Basically 2/3rds of 1/3rd of Dems. Roughly 22% of Dems.
Hah......
With a red-hot poker.
“...Hillary Probed’...”
Details at 11.
And this is without a scintilla of reporting on the lamestream corrupt news. Bias by omission, again.
It is possible that Hillary’s rivals in the DNC have decided to take her and her ilk down. These rivals possibly believe that it would be bad for the Dem-Party, if Hillary rises from her ashes and becomes the Dem-Party 2024 candidate for president. If Hillary became the 2024 DNC candidate, her candidacy would further demean the Dem-Party and decrease the power of the DNC.
I remember, reading years ago, that the DNC rival powers kept Hillary from being the DNC candidate in 2008 by promoting the unknown Barry Obama as their candidate instead of her. Also, the DNC might believe that if Hillary and her ilk are taken down, the take-down might improve the view of the Dem-Party by disillusioned Dem voters. The DNC conjecture may be that a take-down of Hillary would improve their chances of having the winning majority of candidates in the 2022 mid-term elections.
——Just some of my thoughts...
Hillary is toxic. Even Democrats know that it’s time to put her out to pasture.
If Hillary we’re younger they’d be running interference for her in the biggest way and live with her shortcomings. Now she’s not much use for the left and her shortcomings(likability) are hurting the team.
Who is going to do the arresting?
The FBI that was in on it?
Who is going to do the prosecuting?
The DOJ that was in on it?
None of these democraps seem to be in the house or senate where it matters though.
Just what did Democrat candidate, Hillary, have to do with the collusion conspiracy theory?
She’s the only one who could give the green light for any actions taken aka guilty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.